2008
DOI: 10.1167/8.16.8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual short-term memory of local information in briefly viewed natural scenes: Configural and non-configural factors

Abstract: Typical visual environments contain a rich array of colors, textures, surfaces, and objects, but it is well established that observers do not have access to all of these visual details, even over short intervals (R. A. Rensink, J. K. O'Regan, & J. J. Clark, 1997). Rather, it seems that human vision extracts only partial information from every glance. What is the nature of this selective encoding of the scene? Although there is considerable research on short-term coding of individual objects, much less is known… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This effect is plotted more compactly in Fig 2F (black symbols) in the form of rich/poor log-ratio values: for the bottom-up comparison ( x axis), log-ratios scatter around 0 (corresponding to no difference between rich and poor values), while for the top-down comparison ( y axis) they all fall above 0 (rich > poor; p < 0.01; see confidence interval indicated by black segment near y axis). It appears that the ability of the human visual system to extract local orientation signals depends greatly on whether those signals correspond to richly versus poorly represented boundaries within the top-down map, and not at all on whether the boundaries are rich or poor on the bottom-up map (see also [ 50 , 51 ]), even though visual inspection of those local boundaries demonstrates no difference for the former comparison ( Fig 2A and 2B versus Fig 2C and 2D ) and an easily perceptible difference for the latter ( Fig 2B and 2D versus Fig 2A and 2C ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This effect is plotted more compactly in Fig 2F (black symbols) in the form of rich/poor log-ratio values: for the bottom-up comparison ( x axis), log-ratios scatter around 0 (corresponding to no difference between rich and poor values), while for the top-down comparison ( y axis) they all fall above 0 (rich > poor; p < 0.01; see confidence interval indicated by black segment near y axis). It appears that the ability of the human visual system to extract local orientation signals depends greatly on whether those signals correspond to richly versus poorly represented boundaries within the top-down map, and not at all on whether the boundaries are rich or poor on the bottom-up map (see also [ 50 , 51 ]), even though visual inspection of those local boundaries demonstrates no difference for the former comparison ( Fig 2A and 2B versus Fig 2C and 2D ) and an easily perceptible difference for the latter ( Fig 2B and 2D versus Fig 2A and 2C ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inversion, however, interferes with the extraction of meaning from scenes (Brockmole & Henderson, 2005;Shore & Klein, 2000;Velisavljevic & Elder, 2008). For example, inverted depictions of scenes are more difficult to recognize (Rock, 1974) and produce less conceptual masking (Intraub, 1984).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chromatic stimuli frequently improve visual memory performance for both normals and dichromats (Gegenfurtner, Wichmann, & Sharpe, 1998;Spence, Wong, Rusan, & Rastegar, 2006;Velisavljević & Elder, 2008). Color variations are frequently used to facilitate some visual tasks (Breslow, Trafton, & Ratwani, 2009;Yamani & McCarley, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%