2002
DOI: 10.1038/sj.eye.6700192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual recovery after macula-off retinal detachment

Abstract: With modern surgical techniques to repair retinal detachments, a greater than 90% primary anatomic success rate can be expected. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] Despite this high level of anatomic success, visual results remain compromised mainly because of permanent functional damage once the macula becomes detached. 10 The most important predictor of visual recovery after retinal detachment surgery is preoperative visual acuity. 8,9,11,12 Preoperative acuity appears to be directly related to the height of macula… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
88
5
6

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
5
88
5
6
Order By: Relevance
“…[23][24][25] The results presented here demonstrate that there is a worse outcome following foveal involvement and therefore, as the rate of detachment cannot be accurately predicted, Table 2 The proportion of patients with 6/9 vision or better at follow-up and the relationship with variables that were significantly related to follow-up vision after multivariate analysis 6/9 or better vision with variable (%) surgeons need to perform prompt surgery for fovea on detachments to avoid progression and foveal detachment. 26 Surgeons have been reassured by publications that show no difference in visual recovery in patients with foveal off RRD and varying duration of symptoms in the first week [27][28][29][30][31] or first 10 days. 32 This has lead to Ross et al 29 suggesting that macular off RRD can wait for a scheduled operating list.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[23][24][25] The results presented here demonstrate that there is a worse outcome following foveal involvement and therefore, as the rate of detachment cannot be accurately predicted, Table 2 The proportion of patients with 6/9 vision or better at follow-up and the relationship with variables that were significantly related to follow-up vision after multivariate analysis 6/9 or better vision with variable (%) surgeons need to perform prompt surgery for fovea on detachments to avoid progression and foveal detachment. 26 Surgeons have been reassured by publications that show no difference in visual recovery in patients with foveal off RRD and varying duration of symptoms in the first week [27][28][29][30][31] or first 10 days. 32 This has lead to Ross et al 29 suggesting that macular off RRD can wait for a scheduled operating list.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 All our patients with a mean age of 58.7 ± 11.0 years at surgery were operated with the same technique within 7 days from macula-off RD onset. In our patients, mean post-operative BCVA slowly improved and reached the same BCVA recorded before RD onset in two out of six cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[26][27][28] Better preoperative VA, a shorter duration of detachment, fewer involved quadrants, younger age, and a lack of macular involvement with the detachment are important positive prognostic factors for VA. [29][30][31] In both groups of patients in our study (those with and those without PVR), the preoperative logMAR VA differed (Table 1) depending on whether the macula was involved. However, in both groups of patients no difference in the 8-month-postoperative logMAR was seen in patients with or without macular involvement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%