2010
DOI: 10.1068/p6530
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual Rays are Parallel

Abstract: Introduction Throughout the history of Western art one encounters frequent systematic deviations from true linear perspective. It is debated whether these are due to unfamiliarity (before the`invention' of linear perspective in the early Renaissance, Alberti 1435^1436/1970) or are intentional digressions (as in modern art). In this paper we show that many of such deviations reflect a hitherto hardly undocumented trait of human vision (Kepler

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(9 reference statements)
2
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Science has no trouble investigating the veridicality of the perceptions of other species and concluding, e.g., in the case of the fly, that they fail to be veridical. Its methods apply equally well to evaluating the veridicality of the perceptions of H. sapiens (Koenderink et al, 2010; Koenderink, 2011b, 2013). …”
Section: Objections and Repliesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Science has no trouble investigating the veridicality of the perceptions of other species and concluding, e.g., in the case of the fly, that they fail to be veridical. Its methods apply equally well to evaluating the veridicality of the perceptions of H. sapiens (Koenderink et al, 2010; Koenderink, 2011b, 2013). …”
Section: Objections and Repliesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At least one participant spontaneously remarked on the fact that the gauge object is not exactly presented frontally; thus, in order to have the face “look at you,” a small correction in the opposite location might be preferred. Indeed, such an effect might be expected due to the nature of the “external local sign” for the majority of the population, a strong effect that we have investigated before (Koenderink et al., 2009, 2010). However, we find no evidence for such a systematic effect here, possibly due to the fact that the angle α is only about 14.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case the probe's stem projects to a single point within the circular base. 27 A slant of π/2 corresponds to a probe that lies on an occluding boundary in the photo. In this case, the probe projects to a "T"-shape with the stem coincident with the axis b 2 , and with the circular base laying in the plane spanned by axes b 1 and b 3 .…”
Section: -28mentioning
confidence: 99%