“…1 for an illustration). Furthermore, in a pilot report by Fiehler et al [17] involving the same dataset as Geisler et al [16], the interobserver agreement for correctly identifying the affected side was considered ‘fair’ only (ĸ = 0.239), and after unblinding the visibility of the T2’ hypo-intense lesion was considered ‘good’ in only 9 out of 20 patients by consensus, raising questions about the method’s reliability in the clinical setting – notwithstanding that some of the images presented are quite convincing. In a further report from the same group on 100 patients [18], the T2’-apparent diffusion coefficient mismatch had better specificity than the PWI-apparent diffusion coefficient mismatch for predicting infarct growth; however, there was high variability in T2’ lesions visibility and the interobserver reliability was moderate only (ĸ = 0.53).…”