1981
DOI: 10.1152/jn.1981.46.2.369
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual properties of neurons in a polysensory area in superior temporal sulcus of the macaque.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

36
642
1
10

Year Published

1991
1991
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,150 publications
(697 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
36
642
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…This is exactly the BOLD signal we recorded from STSms: ipsilateral responses were significantly greater than zero, but significantly weaker than the response to contralateral visual stimulation. Macaque STP shows a significant fMRI response to moving compared with static stimuli (Nelissen et al, 2006) and visually-responsive macaque STP neurons are best activated by moving stimuli (Bruce et al, 1981;Hikosaka et al, 1988). Consistent with this finding, we observed significantly greater responses to moving compared with stationary stimuli in STSms, with only a weak response to static images.…”
Section: Homology Between Macaque Stp and The Human Sts Multisensory supporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is exactly the BOLD signal we recorded from STSms: ipsilateral responses were significantly greater than zero, but significantly weaker than the response to contralateral visual stimulation. Macaque STP shows a significant fMRI response to moving compared with static stimuli (Nelissen et al, 2006) and visually-responsive macaque STP neurons are best activated by moving stimuli (Bruce et al, 1981;Hikosaka et al, 1988). Consistent with this finding, we observed significantly greater responses to moving compared with stationary stimuli in STSms, with only a weak response to static images.…”
Section: Homology Between Macaque Stp and The Human Sts Multisensory supporting
confidence: 86%
“…Previous fMRI studies of auditory-visual integration in STS (Beauchamp et al, 2004a;Beauchamp et al, 2004b;Hein et al, 2007;Van Atteveldt et al, 2004;van Atteveldt et al, 2007) and auditory-tactile integration in auditory cortex (Kayser et al, 2005) have also not observed super-additive changes in the BOLD signal, perhaps because only a few single neurons show super-additivity (Laurienti et al, 2005;Perrault et al, 2005). Supporting this idea, in single-unit recording studies, only a small fraction of STP neurons respond to both auditory and tactile stimulation (Bruce et al, 1981;Hikosaka et al, 1988); the same is true in multisensory regions of cat cortex (Clemo et al, 2007). Conversely, many single neurons may show no response to a sensory stimulus in isolation, but the same stimulus may modulate responses when presented with other sensory modalities .…”
Section: Multisensory Integration In Stsmsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ventral part of LIP connects with areas dealing with spatial information (visual area MT and the auditory caudiomedial area; Andersen et al, 1997), as well as with the frontal eye field (Schall et al, 1995), whereas the dorsal part of LIP is connected with areas responsible for the processing of visual information related to the form of objects in the inferotemporal cortex (ventral ''what" visual pathway). In parallel, the temporal region of the superior temporal sulcus (STS) is connected with the visual occipital cortices (Seltzer and Pandya, 1994) and with the secondary auditory area (area 22 of Brodmann; Pandya and Seltzer, 1982) providing the multimodal properties of neurons in area STP (Bruce et al, 1981;Baylis et al, 1987;Hikosaka et al, 1988). Along the same line, the prefrontal cortex, playing a role in temporal integration, receives projections from the auditory and the visual cortices (e.g.…”
Section: Heteromodal Connections: Connections Between Different Sensomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1A). Because this visual area also contains a large proportion of auditory and somatosensory neurons (Bruce et al, 1981;Hikosaka et al, 1988), this projection can also provide non-visual information to the primary visual cortex.…”
Section: Primary Sensory Areas Receive Non-specific Inputsmentioning
confidence: 99%