Visual outcomes of a new nondiffractive extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens targeted for minimonovision: 3-month results of a prospective cohort study

Amelsfort, Thomas van; Webers, Valentijn S C; Bauer, Noël; L, Clement; Biggelaar, Frank J H M van den; Nuijts, Rudy M.M.A.

doi:10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000825

Cited by 26 publications

(48 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Arrigo et al reported on the refractive outcome; far, intermediate, and near vision and quality of vision score in 54 healthy patients [ 9 ]. Gundersen and Potvin studied the effects on the binocular defocus curve in 40 healthy patients by simulating myopia in the nondominant eye [ 8 ] and a group from the Netherlands reported the refractive outcomes, defocus curves, spectacle independence, photic phenomena, and Catquest-9SF questionnaires in 22 healthy patients targeted for monovision [ 11 ]. Kohnen et al studied these same outcome measures in a group of 16 healthy patients targeted for emmetropia [ 10 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Kohnen et al reported a monocular UCDVA and CDVA of 0.12 ± 0.14 logMAR and 0.01 ± 0.05 logMAR, respectively [ 10 ], while the group from the Netherlands found a CDVA of −0.04 ± 0.11 logMAR in the dominant eye [ 11 ]. Arrigo et al reported a monocular UCDVA and CDVA of 0.1 ± 0.04 and 0.0 ± 0.03, respectively [ 9 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Uncorrected monocular visual acuity in our study was better than reported by Kohnen et al [ 10 ], possibly due to the lower postoperative spherical equivalent in our patients (−0.04 ± 0.17 D in the control group and −0.07 ± 0.19 D in the study group) compared with the one in their study: −0.16 ± 0.356 D with 90.6% of eyes within ±0.50 D of target refraction, compared with 96% of eyes in our study. The Netherland group reported a postoperative spherical equivalent in the dominant eye of 0.11 ± 0.31 D [ 11 ] and Arrigo et al of −0.1 ± 0.2 D [ 9 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Regarding binocular function, Kohnen et al reported a binocular UCDVA and CDVA of 0.01 ± 0.05 and −0.02 ± 0.07, respectively, [ 10 ] and the Netherland group with their monovision approach, −0.07 ± 0.10 and −0.10 ± 0.08, respectively [ 11 ]. Again, this compares favourably with the uncorrected values of −0.06 ± 0.06 for the control group and −0.05 ± 0.06 for the study group and corrected values of −0.06 ± 0.06 for both groups in our study.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Several studies have recently reported outcomes in patients implanted with the Vivity IOL in a clinical setting [ 8 – 11 ]. However, these reports exclude patients with ocular pathologies.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Patient Satisfaction and Visual Performance in Patients with Ocular Pathology after Bilateral Implantation of a New Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lens

Rementería-Capelo

Lorente

Carrillo

et al. 2022

Journal of Ophthalmology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim. To evaluate visual results and patient-perceived outcomes in patients with ocular pathologies implanted with a new extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens (IOL). Methods. Patients with ocular pathology undergoing cataract surgery and bilaterally implanted with Vivity® IOLs were evaluated three months after surgery. The control group included patients with no ocular pathologies. Binocular defocus curves, corrected and uncorrected mono- and binocular distance visual acuity (DVA), and binocular contrast sensitivity were measured. Patients completed the Catquest-9SF questionnaire and reported on dysphotopsia and their need for spectacle-correction. Results. Twenty-five patients were included in each group. Monocular uncorrected DVA was better in the control group (−0.01 ± 0.07) compared with the study group (0.03 ± 0.08), p = 0.027 . There were no other statistically significant differences in DVA, with an uncorrected binocular acuity of −0.06 ± 0.06 for the control group and −0.05 ± 0.06 for the study group. Binocular defocus curves were similar for both groups and there were no differences in contrast sensitivity values. Pooling the refractive results, 96% of eyes were within ±0.50 D of target refraction. Seventy percent of patients in the control group reported no halos, compared with 40% in the study group, p = 0.047 . In both groups, 40% of patients reported being completely spectacle-independent, with the other 60% requiring glasses for near vision always or often. All patients reported being fairly or very satisfied with their vision. Conclusion. Initial results of visual function after Vivity implantation in patients with ocular pathologies are encouraging, with high patient satisfaction and few difficulties for daily activities.

show abstract