2020
DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.5132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual Outcome at 4 Years Following Plaque Radiotherapy and Prophylactic Intravitreal Bevacizumab (Every 4 Months for 2 Years) for Uveal Melanoma

Abstract: IMPORTANCE Radiation retinopathy following plaque radiotherapy for uveal melanoma can lead to vision loss that might be avoided with prophylactic anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment.OBJECTIVE To determine visual outcome following prophylactic intravitreal bevacizumab in patients with plaque-irradiated uveal melanoma.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
50
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
50
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…FSRT centres report for 24.5-42% [7,22]. A point of attention is that almost 60% of the current study population was in the era before anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) intravitreal injections, which could explain the high percentage of neovascular glaucoma in both groups, and with the current treatment options with anti-VEGF we may expect less neovascular glaucoma, however, this has to be evaluated in a prospective study [28]. A tumour within 3 mm of the optic nerve would result in a high dose of radiation of the optic nerve and consequently would lead to a decrease in visual acuity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…FSRT centres report for 24.5-42% [7,22]. A point of attention is that almost 60% of the current study population was in the era before anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) intravitreal injections, which could explain the high percentage of neovascular glaucoma in both groups, and with the current treatment options with anti-VEGF we may expect less neovascular glaucoma, however, this has to be evaluated in a prospective study [28]. A tumour within 3 mm of the optic nerve would result in a high dose of radiation of the optic nerve and consequently would lead to a decrease in visual acuity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…After radiation, high doses of VEGF are found in the eye [33]. The treatment of anti-VEGF intravitreal injections seems to limit visual loss associated with radiation maculopathy, although this was analysed after a different form of radiation treatment with plaque therapy [28,34]. Shields et al observed a decrease in radiation maculopathy with preservation of visual acuity after prophylactic Bevacizumab every four months [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical evidence of radiation maculopathy at month 24 was seen in 8 of 24 (33%) patients with small/medium tumours vs 42 of 62 (68%) of controls ( P = .004). 20 In a recent study on radiation complications and visual outcome in 1131 patients with uveal melanoma managed with plaque radiotherapy and post‐radiotherapy prophylactic intravitreal bevacizumab, Shields et al found the bevacizumab group had less OCT‐evident CME at 4 months ( P = .002), 24 months ( P = .02) and 36 months ( P = .01); less clinically evident radiation maculopathy at 24 months ( P = .03), 36 months ( P = .01) and 48 months ( P = .03); and less clinically evident radiation papillopathy at 4 months ( P = .02) and 18 months ( P = .04) compared to the non‐bevacizumab group 21 . These findings correlated with better visual outcomes in the bevacizumab group at 4 months (0.18 [20/30] vs 0.30 [20/40], P = .04), 12 months (0.30 [20/40] vs 0.48 [20/60], P = .02), 18 months (0.40 [20/50] vs 0.70 [20/100], P = .003), 24 months (0.40 [20/50] vs 0.70 [20/100], P < .001), 36 months (0.48 [20/60] vs 1.00 [20/200], P = .003) and 48 months (0.54 [20/70], vs 2.00, [counting fingers], P < .001) compared to controls 21 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…16 Damage to these structures can result in various radiation complications, including dry eye, corneal ulceration, a cataract, iris neovascularization, neovascular glaucoma, and radiation maculopathy, retinopathy, and papillopathy. 17,18 Radiation physicists often add 1 mm to the ocular oncologist's prescribed radiation depth to account for scleral thickness. If the sclera is already included in the measurement of the tumor, this can lead to overtreatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%