2019
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual Exploration of Dynamic or Static Joint Attention Bids in Children With Autism Syndrome Disorder

Abstract: Eye-tracking studies have revealed a specific visual exploration style characterizing individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of stimulus type (static vs. dynamic) on visual exploration in children with ASD. Twenty-eight children with ASD, 28 children matched for developmental communication age, and 28 children matched for chronological age watched a video and a series of photos involving the same joint attention scene. For each stimulus, areas of int… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All eye-tracking data can be publicly accessible at the website https://doi. org/10.6084/m9.figshare.20113592 (Cilia et al, 2019;Cilia et al, 2021;Cilia et al, 2022).…”
Section: Eye-tracking Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All eye-tracking data can be publicly accessible at the website https://doi. org/10.6084/m9.figshare.20113592 (Cilia et al, 2019;Cilia et al, 2021;Cilia et al, 2022).…”
Section: Eye-tracking Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chevallier et al (2015) compared static and dynamic visual tasks involving both social and nonsocial stimuli and found that autistic children spent less time looking at social than nonsocial stimuli compared with TD children. Finally, a recent study by Cilia et al (2019) showed that both static and dynamic stimuli were relevant in distinguishing autistic from TD children using eye gaze. On the one hand, static stimuli enabled AOIs to be identified with greater precision, showing similar patterns in the two populations.…”
Section: Eye Gaze To Social Attentional Cue Recognition In Asdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such differences might be dependent on the study methodology and the type of social stimuli involved. Using either static or dynamic social stimuli might yield different results, and only a few studies have compared these two conditions (e.g., Chevallier et al, 2015; Cilia et al, 2019; Saitovich et al, 2013; Shic et al, 2014; Speer et al, 2007). Shic et al (2014) compared a neutral female face image, a video with a woman smiling, and a video with a woman smiling and speaking and found that autistic children looked less often at the eyes in the social stimuli condition and in response to the dynamic stimulus of the woman speaking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The counterbalancing of stimuli for participants and the number of participants included allowed the artificial intelligence and psychology teams to collaborate on the basis of this predefined research protocol. The results of these tests have been partly exploited, presented, and published [31][32][33].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%