2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2014.09.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual enhancement of 3D images of rock faces for fracture mapping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…post-flood analysis), though issues with georeferencing, reliability, accuracy and precision remain (Boulos et al, 2011). In general, as our ability to acquire input data improves, managing data volumes and identifying efficient methods of generating and intelligently decimating point clouds (Lai et al, 2014;Morales et al, 2011) represents the main bottleneck for the future development of SfM-MVS.…”
Section: Looking Forward: the Potential Of Sfm-mvsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…post-flood analysis), though issues with georeferencing, reliability, accuracy and precision remain (Boulos et al, 2011). In general, as our ability to acquire input data improves, managing data volumes and identifying efficient methods of generating and intelligently decimating point clouds (Lai et al, 2014;Morales et al, 2011) represents the main bottleneck for the future development of SfM-MVS.…”
Section: Looking Forward: the Potential Of Sfm-mvsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the 3-D comparison method was used, the volume variation was calculated as follows. Firstly, for each scenario, a mesh was generated using the Delaunay triangulation or the Poisson reconstruction [46]. Then, the intersection of both meshes was selected, and both were merged into a closed mesh.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calculation of height variations was performed through the comparison of high-detail 3-D datasets (more than seven scans were conducted in a 300 m 2 area) using the M3C2 algorithm. Previous works gridded the cloud using a 1 m by 1 m cell [46][47][48], or 2 m by 2 m [29], and calculated height variations through the Difference of DEMs method (DoD). This process led to a reduction in the definition of such variations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of remote sensing methods for discontinuity mapping has increased significantly in the last decade. There are several applications of remote sensing techniques in rock engineering practice, such as rock mass characterization (Tonon and Kottenstette, 2006); (Ferrero et al, 2009); (Lato et al, 2009), (Lato et al, 2010); (Gigli and Casagli, 2011); (Lato et al, 2013); (Otoo et al, 2013); (Deliormanli et al, 2014); (Lai et al, 2014), rock slope stability (Strouth et al, 2006); (Ghirotti and Genevois, 2007); (Sturzenegger and Stead, 2009); (Lato and Vöge, 2011); (Lato et al, 2012); (Lato et al, 2015); (Tuckey and Stead, 2016) and underground excavations (Fekete et al, 2010); (Styles et al, 2010); (Fekete and Diederichs, 2013); (Lato and Diederichs, 2014); (Preston et al, 2014); (Walton et al, 2014); (Cacciari and Futai, 2017); (Delaloye et al, 2015); (Villalobos et al, 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%