2015
DOI: 10.2144/000114253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual Detection of Isothermal Nucleic Acid Amplification Using pH-Sensitive Dyes

Abstract: Nucleic acid amplification is the basis for many molecular diagnostic assays. In these cases, the amplification product must be detected and analyzed, typically requiring extended workflow time, sophisticated equipment, or both. Here we present a novel method of amplification detection that harnesses the pH change resulting from amplification reactions performed with minimal buffering capacity. In loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) reactions, we achieved rapid (<30 min) and sensitive (<10 copies) vi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
442
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 526 publications
(479 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
442
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…44 LAMP was performed using the Bst 2.0 DNA Polymerase, an in silico designed homologue of Bst DNA Polymerase I, Large Fragment, commonly used in this reaction, and its supplied buffer. 45 In transitioning the reaction from tubes to paper, the concentration of betaine, primers, and enzyme were optimized, as was the incubation time, to minimize nonspecific reactions and maximize sensitivity, as shown in Figure S1 and discussed in the Supporting Information. The final reactions contained 1× isothermal amplification buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, 10 mM (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 , 50 mM KCl, 2 mM MgSO 4 , 0.1% Tween-20) supplemented with an additional 6 mM MgSO 4 , 0.9 M betaine, 1.4 mM of each dNTP, 1.6 μM of each inner primer (FIP, BIP), 0.8 μM of each loop primer (LF, LB), 0.2 μM of each outer primer (F3, B3), and 0.32 U of polymerase.…”
Section: ■ Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…44 LAMP was performed using the Bst 2.0 DNA Polymerase, an in silico designed homologue of Bst DNA Polymerase I, Large Fragment, commonly used in this reaction, and its supplied buffer. 45 In transitioning the reaction from tubes to paper, the concentration of betaine, primers, and enzyme were optimized, as was the incubation time, to minimize nonspecific reactions and maximize sensitivity, as shown in Figure S1 and discussed in the Supporting Information. The final reactions contained 1× isothermal amplification buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, 10 mM (NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 , 50 mM KCl, 2 mM MgSO 4 , 0.1% Tween-20) supplemented with an additional 6 mM MgSO 4 , 0.9 M betaine, 1.4 mM of each dNTP, 1.6 μM of each inner primer (FIP, BIP), 0.8 μM of each loop primer (LF, LB), 0.2 μM of each outer primer (F3, B3), and 0.32 U of polymerase.…”
Section: ■ Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gel electrophoretic detection of LAMP product is more time consuming, but this phase can be spared when dsDNA binding SybrGreen or pH sensitive dyes are used in the reaction. The naked eye can distinguish between positive and negative LAMP reactions based on colour alteration (TANNER et al, 2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the high concentration of Mn 2ϩ that we found necessary to reduce background calcein fluorescence, it is unsurprising that the LAMP assay does not achieve the same sensitivity as the benchmark real-time PCR method. Further optimization to reduce the Mn 2ϩ concentration or implement an alternative detection method such as the use of hydroxynaphthol blue or pH-sensitive dyes could improve results to achieve comparable sensitivity (17,31).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%