1991
DOI: 10.18785/negs.1201.02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual Census of Reef Fish Assemblages: A Comparison of Slate, Audio, and Video Recording Devices

Abstract: Fish assemblage data were recorded using slate, audio, and video techniques with a point-count visual census technique under controlled conditions. The community variables (number of species, number of individuals, and species diversity) describing the assemblage were generally similar for all three recording methods but audio recorded parameters were higher in magnitude. Slate and audio techniques were more similar to each other than each was to video with regard to the assemblage variables. Community resembl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
24
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(8 reference statements)
3
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this direction, Okamoto (1989) has compared ROV visual censuses with other techniques in an aquarium tank while Spanier et al (1994) stressed the need to conduct comparative studies of the relative utility of scuba versus ROV technologies for observing the behavior of marine animals. Moreover, several studies have also tested census techniques by means of underwater video recordings from a fixed point (Francour et al 1999), video-operator (Bortone et al 1991;Harvey et al 2002;Tessier et al 2005) or submersibles (Love et al 2000). ROV, equipped with high definition video cameras, are increasingly used as a tool for underwater investigation, being capable to reach depths inaccessible to scuba divers and to record data even in adverse operative conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this direction, Okamoto (1989) has compared ROV visual censuses with other techniques in an aquarium tank while Spanier et al (1994) stressed the need to conduct comparative studies of the relative utility of scuba versus ROV technologies for observing the behavior of marine animals. Moreover, several studies have also tested census techniques by means of underwater video recordings from a fixed point (Francour et al 1999), video-operator (Bortone et al 1991;Harvey et al 2002;Tessier et al 2005) or submersibles (Love et al 2000). ROV, equipped with high definition video cameras, are increasingly used as a tool for underwater investigation, being capable to reach depths inaccessible to scuba divers and to record data even in adverse operative conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their separation is especially difficult where the target organisms are highly mobile within the time taken to complete a count, such as with underwater surveys of fishes. Several authors have examined sources of methodological error in underwater visual surveys of fishes, including the counting method (Sale & Douglas 1981, DeMartini & Roberts 1982, Kimmel 1985, Sanderson & Solonsky 1986, Thresher & Gunn 1986, Greene & Alevizon 1989, Bortone et al 1991, Samoilys 1992, Mapstone & Ayling 1993, the numbers of taxa counted simultaneously (Russell et al 1978, Greene & Alevizon 1989, Lincoln-Smith 1989, the speed with which counts are done (Mapstone 1988, Lincoln-Smith 1989, St. John et al 1990, and the shape and dimensions of sampling units (Sale & Sharp 1983, Fowler 1987, McCormick & Choat 1987, Mapstone 1988, Buckley & Hueckel 1989, Mapstone & Ayling 1993.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the two methods have the ability to collect data over the same spatial area, information should be relatively comparable, allowing for a combination of methods within a single assessment program. The comparability of the data produced by UVC and single camera DOV has previously been demonstrated in studies conducted in large aquaria (Greene and Alevizon 1989;Bortone et al 1991) and coral reefs on oceanic islands (Tessier et al 2005;Pelletier et al 2011). However, how UVC and stereo-DOV compare, and how this differs across a range of biogeographic regions (e.g., temperate rocky reefs and sub-tropical fringing reefs) where there are large variations in habitat complexity, water visibility, fish diversity, and abundance, is currently relatively unknown.…”
mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Underwater video camera techniques have increasingly been used for assessing shallow water fish assemblages in more recent times (e.g., Bortone et al 1991;Parker et al 1994;Moser et al 1998), and the continued development of camera technology has enabled rapid advances in these techniques (e.g., image resolution, storage capacity, software capabilities; Shortis et al 2009). Using two cameras set in a stereo configuration enables precise estimates of fish lengths, which allows robust evaluation of size distributions and biomass where length/weight relationships are known .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%