1997
DOI: 10.1006/cviu.1997.0528
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual Behaviors for Docking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Techniques based on constrained projective geometry determined by robotic embodiment are common in active perceptual-based systems, such as divergent stereo and other systems for docking (e.g., [49]). In divergent stereo, robots navigate along corridors remaining centred between textured walls.…”
Section: Other Active Vision Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Techniques based on constrained projective geometry determined by robotic embodiment are common in active perceptual-based systems, such as divergent stereo and other systems for docking (e.g., [49]). In divergent stereo, robots navigate along corridors remaining centred between textured walls.…”
Section: Other Active Vision Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calculating the derivative of optical flow to estimate TTC further amplifies noise, generally leading to an unstable and unreliable estimate of TTC. Most demonstrations of this approach tend to use highly textured objects in order to obtain a dense velocity fields [3]. Such textured objects may provide a useful laboratory demonstration, but are not generally representative of the objects observed in real world scenes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When affine camera models are assumed [7], [4], [3], then affine image conditions are required 1 . Camera motion is sometimes restricted to planar motion [3], [8] or to not include vertical displacements [7] or cyclotorsion [8] An alternative approach is to compute TTC from scaled depth [1], [5]. This approach [9] is more complex and can be shown to introduce new constraints and additional errors when these constrains are not fully satisfied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To avoid this a priori knowledge, some authors propose modelfree approaches [7], [8] but note that the desired visual features are needed. Other works [9], [10], based on dynamic visual features, do not require the desired image but require a model of the object. Besides, note that, for now, these works are only dedicated to planar objects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%