Visual analogue scale (VAS) as a monitoring tool for daily changes in asthma symptoms in adolescents: a prospective study

Abstract

BackgroundSuccess in asthma management hinges on patients’ competency to detect and respond to ever-changing symptom severity. Thus, it is crucial to have reliable, simple, and sustainable methods of symptom monitoring that can be readily incorporated into daily life. Although visual analogue scale (VAS) has been considered as a simple symptom assessment method, its utility as a daily symptom monitoring tool in adolescents is unknown. This study was to determine the concurrent validity of VAS in capturing diurnal changes in symptoms and to examine the relationships between VAS and asthma control and pulmonary function.MethodsForty-two adolescents (12–17 years old) with asthma completed daily assessment of symptoms twice per day, morning and bedtime, for a week using VAS and 6-item symptom diary concurrently. Asthma control was measured at enrollment and 6 month later, and spirometry was conducted at enrollment. Pearson correlations, multilevel modeling and regression were conducted to assess the relationships between VAS and symptom diary, asthma control and FEV1.ResultsMorning and evening VAS was positively associated with symptom diary items of each corresponding time frame of the day (r = 0.41–0.58, p < 0.0001). Morning VAS was significantly predicted by morning diary data reflecting nocturnal wakening (β = 2.13, p = 0.033) and morning symptoms (β = 4.09, p = 0.002), accounting for 57% of the total variance of morning VAS. Similarly, changes in four evening diary items, particularly shortness of breath (β = 2.60, p = 0.028), significantly predicted changes in evening VAS, accounting for 55% of the total variance. Average VAS scores correlated with asthma control (r = 0.65, p < 0.001) and FEV1 (r = −0.38, p = 0.029), and were predictive of asthma control 6 months later (β = 0.085, p = 0.006).ConclusionsVAS is a valid tool capturing diurnal changes in symptoms reflected in a multi-item symptom diary. Moreover, VAS is a valid measure predicting concurrent and future asthma control. The findings suggest VAS can be a simple alternative to daily dairies for daily symptom monitoring, which can provide invaluable information about current and future asthma control without substantially increasing self-monitoring burdens for adolescent patients. Clinical Trial Registration NCT01696357. Registered 18 September 2012

Mixed‐methods content and sentiment analysis of adolescents’ voice diaries describing daily experiences with asthma and self‐management decision‐making

“…Most teens in our sample perceived themselves as having controlled asthma despite regular and sometimes severe symptoms. In conjunction with prior research, this suggests that teens may not only misrepresent how often symptoms occur, but also how severe symptoms are. Our data suggest that symptom misperception may be a key factor in under‐reporting, with two conceptually distinct underlying reasons: minimizing (ie aware, but believing it not too bad) and not recognizing (either perceptually unaware or not recognizing a symptom as being due to asthma).…”

Verifying the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) Behavioral Scale

“…In the previous studies, the FLACC Behavioral Scale was compared with other observable behavioral pain scales such as the Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (CHEOPS), the Children’s and Infants Post Operative Pain Scale (CHIPPS), and the Objective Pain Scale (OPS) [ 20 , 23 ]. However, as Japanese hospitals do not currently use any of these observable scales, we thusly chose the VAS obs which is considered a simple assessment scale [ 24 ]. Our present results are in line with the original author’s results [ 3 ].…”

Measuring Emotional Response to a Planting Activity for Staff at an Urban Office Setting: A Pilot Study

“…Visual analogue scales have been shown to be an effective and efficient means to gather information on factors such as pain and consumer satisfaction (Abend, Dan, Maoz, Raz, & Bar-Haim, 2014;Ismail et al, 2015). They can be completed by individuals with low literacy and are less vulnerable to confounding factors than Likert scales (Rhee, Belyea, & Mammen, 2017;Voutilainen, Pitkäaho, Kvist, & Vehviläinen-Julkunen, 2016).…”