1963
DOI: 10.1097/00006324-196309000-00004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual Acuity Within the Area Centralis and Its Relation to Eye Movements and Fixation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies of reading and scanning are consistent with the finding that target detection, discrimination, and location, in both cued and uncued conditions in an eyes-fixed paradigm, are superior along the horizontal as opposed to the vertical axis (Carrasco, Talgar & Cameron, 2001). As these authors hypothesize, these findings appear to reflect the fact that acuity drops off faster with vertical distance from the fovea than with horizontal distance (Weymouth, Hines, Acres, Raaf & Wheeler, 1928) which in turn reflects anatomical studies of cone spacing in the fovea and perifovea (Curcio & Allen, 1990). In corroborating and extending these prior studies, our results suggest that in response to smaller perceptual span and greater fall-off in acuity along the vertical axis subjects adopt a scanning strategy in which the items scanned per fixation and saccade amplitude are smaller while fixation duration increases much less.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…These studies of reading and scanning are consistent with the finding that target detection, discrimination, and location, in both cued and uncued conditions in an eyes-fixed paradigm, are superior along the horizontal as opposed to the vertical axis (Carrasco, Talgar & Cameron, 2001). As these authors hypothesize, these findings appear to reflect the fact that acuity drops off faster with vertical distance from the fovea than with horizontal distance (Weymouth, Hines, Acres, Raaf & Wheeler, 1928) which in turn reflects anatomical studies of cone spacing in the fovea and perifovea (Curcio & Allen, 1990). In corroborating and extending these prior studies, our results suggest that in response to smaller perceptual span and greater fall-off in acuity along the vertical axis subjects adopt a scanning strategy in which the items scanned per fixation and saccade amplitude are smaller while fixation duration increases much less.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In fact, direct psychophysical evaluation with stimuli at very small eccentricity angles has given mixed results. Some studies have found a decline in performance with eccentricity, whereas others have reported minimal changes (Weymouth et al, 1928; Millodot, 1972). Mapping foveal vision is, however, a very challenging task.…”
Section: Visual Functions Of Microsaccadesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Humans collect visual information from a remarkably broad field of view, covering an angle larger than 180° . Monitoring such a wide area, however, comes at a cost: a variety of visual functions including acuity are not uniform throughout the visual field, but progressively deteriorate with increasing distance from a small region, approximately the size of the full moon in the sky (Weymouth et al 1928; Jacobs 1979; Legge & Kersten 1987; Hansen, Pracejus & Gegenfurtner 2009; Nandy & Tjan 2012). This is the portion of the visual field that projects onto the foveola, the tiny region of the retina where rods receptors are absent and cones most densely packed.…”
Section: Vision and Eye Movementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have reported a decline in performance with eccentricity, whereas others have found minimal changes (Weymouth et al 1928; Adler & Meyer 1935; Millodot 1966). However, it is critical to realize that testing visual acuity at very small eccentricities is extremely challenging.…”
Section: Visual Functions Of Microsaccadesmentioning
confidence: 99%