2012 4th IEEE RAS &Amp; EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/biorob.2012.6290668
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vision-based posture assessment to detect and categorize compensation during robotic rehabilitation therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our methods showed better classification performance, with an average F1-score of 0.989 for side-and-side reaching and 0.998 for up-and-down reaching. Babak Taati et al [12,16,23] applied a camera-based system to identify and categorize compensatory movements by a multiclass classifier. An acceptable accuracy (86% per frame) was achieved in healthy adult subjects who were asked to simulate a series of compensation movements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our methods showed better classification performance, with an average F1-score of 0.989 for side-and-side reaching and 0.998 for up-and-down reaching. Babak Taati et al [12,16,23] applied a camera-based system to identify and categorize compensatory movements by a multiclass classifier. An acceptable accuracy (86% per frame) was achieved in healthy adult subjects who were asked to simulate a series of compensation movements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main drawback of the sensor-based systems is the possibility of inducing unnatural movements due to the attached sensors. It is difficult to find an unobtrusive and easy-to-use solution [12]. Moreover, the validity and reliability of the outcome estimates from these wearable sensors for rehabilitation of stroke survivors is a daunting challenge for researchers [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Automated real-time auditory feedback for compensation (Thielman, 2010) was considered as a safer alternative. In the context of motion-based therapeutic games, addressing compensation has been limited to detecting compensation (Taati, Wang, Huq, Snoek, & Mihailidis, 2012), and preventing users from succeeding with it (Da Gama et al, 2012), rather than actively encouraging users to reduce compensation. Therefore, current efforts for addressing compensation in unsupervised therapeutic exercises may not reduce compensation as well as therapist supervision.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applying intelligent rehabilitation techniques, such as rehabilitation robots [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] or in-home rehabilitation systems based on wearable sensors [8][9][10][11][12], to help people suffering from limited mobile ability to perform physical rehabilitation is of significance. Such intelligent techniques alleviate the shortage of physical therapists and realize data monitoring for more accurate evaluations on patients [13][14][15][16], and thus have become a new trend in recent years. The traditional scenario for lower limb rehabilitation is level walking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%