1978
DOI: 10.1039/f19787402070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Viscosity and conductance studies in ethylene carbonate at 40°C

Abstract: Viscometric measurements of numerous electrolytes in ethylene carbonate (EC) at 40°C are reported. B-coefficients, obtained by the Jones-Dole equation, are compared with those relative to other dipolar aprotic solvents. Conductometric measurements in EC for some salts are also reported, so that these, together with the viscometric data, permit a more complete analysis of ions o lvent interaction,We are systematically studying the transport properties of electrolytes in dipolar aprotic solvents to obtain infor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data from the CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 64 except for: b Easteal and Woolf; 65 c Easteal and Woolf; 66 d Marcus and Hefter; 67 e Chernyak; 68 f Petrella and Sacco; 69 g Naejus et al ; 70 h Barthel et al . 71 …”
Section: Partial Molar Volume and Electrostrictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data from the CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 64 except for: b Easteal and Woolf; 65 c Easteal and Woolf; 66 d Marcus and Hefter; 67 e Chernyak; 68 f Petrella and Sacco; 69 g Naejus et al ; 70 h Barthel et al . 71 …”
Section: Partial Molar Volume and Electrostrictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6][7][8]11,[20][21][22] Accordingly, the Bjerrum critical distance for univalent ions exhibited a near independence on but a strong dependency on w, rising steadily as fell with the change of w, indicating a corresponding change in ion association. 3,4,6,7,9,11,20,21,[23][24][25] Furthermore, the of (LiPF 6 ) m -PC 1Ϫw DEC w and (LiPF 6 ) m -PC 1Ϫw EC w solutions rose with m and fell with w of DEC but rose with w of EC, and the of (LiPF 6 ) m -PC 1Ϫw DEC w peaked in both m and w thus forming a dome in the mw coordinates, but the of (LiPF 6 ) m -PC 1Ϫw EC w peaked only in m thus forming an arch. 3,4,6,7,9,11,20,21,[23][24][25] Furthermore, the of (LiPF 6 ) m -PC 1Ϫw DEC w and (LiPF 6 ) m -PC 1Ϫw EC w solutions rose with m and fell with w of DEC but rose with w of EC, and the of (LiPF 6 ) m -PC 1Ϫw DEC w peaked in both m and w thus forming a dome in the mw coordinates, but the of (LiPF 6 ) m -PC 1Ϫw EC w peaked only in m thus forming an arch.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This equation is also plotted as a T g surface in the mw-coordinates as the insert in the figure, describing a simple surface slanting down from the high-corner of high m and w toward the low-corner of low m and w. It is thus clear that the addition of LiBOB in PC 1Ϫw EC w solvent continuously raised of the resulting solution, a phenomenon observed in many Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 152 ͑1͒ A132-A140 ͑2005͒ A134 other electrolytes. 1,6,9,13,[22][23][24] It also appears that the rise of T g due to the addition of salt was independent of that due to the change of solvent composition, which is most clearly seen in the absence of a cross-product term in the fitting function of Eq. 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 The of the solvents has been estimated by measuring their glass transition temperature T g , and found to fall steadily with w in PC 1Ϫw DEC w but rise in PC 1Ϫw EC w 4 ͑ of DEC, PC, and EC at 40°C: 0.622, 1.91, and 1.93 mPa s 12,18 ͒, as would normally be expected between similar liquids. 4,6,8,9,11,13,19,[22][23][24] Furthermore, the of (LiPF 6 ) m -PC 1Ϫw DEC w , (LiPF 6 ) m -PC 1Ϫw EC w , (LiBF 4 ) m -PC 1Ϫw DEC w , and (LiBF 4 ) m -PC 1Ϫw EC w solutions has been found to rise with m and fall with w of DEC but rise with w of EC.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation