2010
DOI: 10.1021/jp911372j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Viscosities of the Mixtures of 1-Ethyl-3-Methylimidazolium Chloride with Water, Acetonitrile and Glucose: A Molecular Dynamics Simulation and Experimental Study

Abstract: A recently improved ionic liquid force field was used to compute the viscosity for binary and ternary mixtures of 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride ([emim][Cl]) with water, acetonitrile, and glucose. For the same systems, experimental viscosity data are provided. The simulation and experimental results were in reasonable agreement. Simulations consistently overestimate the viscosities for the mixtures of [emim][Cl] and glucose while the viscosities of the mixtures of glucose and water are well reproduced. B… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
53
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(99 reference statements)
3
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…42 We mimic an infinite crystal structure by implementing periodic boundary conditions with a shifted LJ potential using a cutoff of 12 Å. LJ cross-interaction parameters were determined by the Lorentz−Berthelot mixing rules. 43 Pressures were converted to chemical potentials using the Peng−Robinson equation of state. 44 Figure S1 in the SI compares density calculations of methane at 1, 5.8, 35, and 65 bar using the TraPPE force field and the Peng−Robinson equation of state with experimental measurements.…”
Section: Evaluating Ppns For Methane Storagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…42 We mimic an infinite crystal structure by implementing periodic boundary conditions with a shifted LJ potential using a cutoff of 12 Å. LJ cross-interaction parameters were determined by the Lorentz−Berthelot mixing rules. 43 Pressures were converted to chemical potentials using the Peng−Robinson equation of state. 44 Figure S1 in the SI compares density calculations of methane at 1, 5.8, 35, and 65 bar using the TraPPE force field and the Peng−Robinson equation of state with experimental measurements.…”
Section: Evaluating Ppns For Methane Storagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result obtained means that a simple logarithmic mixing rule is not obeyed for EMIMAc-water system. Other approaches exist for the calculation of an ''additive'' viscosity of a binary mixture when the log-mixing rule does not work (for example, power law with the exponent 1/3 (Kendall and Monroe 1917) was applied to EMIMClwater mixtures (Chen et al 2010) or exponential approach requesting a fitting parameter was used for aqueous 1-alkyl-3-methyl imidazolium tetrafluoroborate blends (Rilo et al 2010)). A detailed study of EMIMAc-water properties is not in the scope of this work; other methods, more sensitive than viscosity, should be applied to clarify the type and mechanisms of EMIMAc-water interactions.…”
Section: Viscosity Of Emimac-water Mixturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the viscosity is an intrinsic property of the solvent and the diffusion coefficient depends on the solute, the dimensionless Schmidt number that combine this two properties (Sc = ν/D) was also used to characterise the solute global mass transport through its environment [36][37]. Kinematic viscosities ν/m 2 s − 1 defined as the ratio between dynamic viscosity η/kg m − 1 s − 1 and density ρ/kg m − 3 were calculated from [36,[38][39][40] and are summarized as well in Table 1. In order to know if there are significant differences between: i) the calculated data of the diffusion coefficients using different electrochemical techniques, and ii) the calculated data at different temperatures, a two-way (temperature -technique) analysis of variance (ANOVA) [41] was carried out.…”
Section: Journal Of Electroanalytical Chemistry 804 (2017) 148-157mentioning
confidence: 99%