2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.11.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Viscoelastic characterization of the porcine temporomandibular joint disc under unconfined compression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
167
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(186 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
10
167
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The biomechanical testing indicates that degeneration diminished their viscoelastic properties, stress relaxation, damping and dissipation capacities, in accordance with previous studies [12][13][14]. However, the large scatter in the results was normal which caused a poor correlation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The biomechanical testing indicates that degeneration diminished their viscoelastic properties, stress relaxation, damping and dissipation capacities, in accordance with previous studies [12][13][14]. However, the large scatter in the results was normal which caused a poor correlation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The tissue was pre-stressed with 15 cycles of 5% strain followed by sequential stress-relaxation under 10 and 20% strain, using a rate of 10% tissue thickness per second. A load-displacement curve was generated and fitted using a Kelvin-solid viscoelastic model, from which the instantaneous and relaxation modulus values were derived [33]. A second 2 mm biopsy punch was made adjacent to the first, resulting in a dog-bone-shaped tensile specimen in the neocartilage.…”
Section: Neocartilage Biochemical and Mechanical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In tension and compression, the porcine disc's posterior band has greater properties compared with the anterior band (Detamore and Athanasiou, 2003). Additionally, the lateral region demonstrates greater compressive properties compared with the medial region (Lumpkins and McFetridge, 2009), also observed by Allen and Athanasiou (2006) on the superior surface of the disc. Tensile properties in the attachments were consistent with these findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%