2000
DOI: 10.2460/javma.2000.216.222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visceral mast cell tumors in dogs: 10 cases (1982–1997)

Abstract: Visceral MCT is uncommon in dogs, and the prognosis is extremely poor. Biological behavior and drug susceptibility of visceral MCT may be different from cutaneous MCT. The lack of specific clinical signs may result in delay of a definitive diagnosis. The rapid progression of clinical signs and difficulty in diagnosis contributes to a short survival time.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
88
0
14

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
88
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…Factors including histologic grade, World Health Organization stage, duration of disease, argyrophilic nucleolar organizer region count, completeness of surgical excision, DNA ploidy, tumor location, breed, and abnormal expression of the p53 tumor suppressor gene have been evaluated as prognostic indicators for MCT in dogs. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] Tumor location affected the prognosis of dogs with incompletely resected MCT treated with radiation therapy in 1 study in which tumors of the extremities were associated with a lower metastatic rate, longer disease-free intervals, and longer survival times than tumors located on the trunk. 5 A more recent study determined that location did not affect outcome.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Factors including histologic grade, World Health Organization stage, duration of disease, argyrophilic nucleolar organizer region count, completeness of surgical excision, DNA ploidy, tumor location, breed, and abnormal expression of the p53 tumor suppressor gene have been evaluated as prognostic indicators for MCT in dogs. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] Tumor location affected the prognosis of dogs with incompletely resected MCT treated with radiation therapy in 1 study in which tumors of the extremities were associated with a lower metastatic rate, longer disease-free intervals, and longer survival times than tumors located on the trunk. 5 A more recent study determined that location did not affect outcome.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference among the cell lines observed in this study might indicate the nature of the cell origin. VI-MC originated from intestinal MCTs, which have high potential for hematogenous metastasis [18]. Since LN is abundant in the basal lamina of blood vessels, the ability of VI-MC to adhere to LN may play a role in dissemination in intestinal MCTs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Canine MCTs infrequently develop in other sites, including the oral cavity and intestines, which are associated with poorer prognoses [18,20].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Histopathological examination of tissue specimens is usually used to grade the tumour based on the degree of differentiation of the tumour cells (Takahashi et al, 2000;Misdorp, 2004). The staging of the tumour is clinical valuable to assist the surgeon in giving a more accurate prognosis and to provide a base-line data to which the surgeon can retrieve to evaluate therapeutic progress after initiation of therapy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The staging of the tumour is clinical valuable to assist the surgeon in giving a more accurate prognosis and to provide a base-line data to which the surgeon can retrieve to evaluate therapeutic progress after initiation of therapy. The grading systems used to evaluate mast cell tumours are available in literature and can be summarized into 3 grades which are: undifferentiated or poorly differentiated, intermediately differentiated, and well-differentiated or mature according to the degree of cellularity, morphology of cancer cells and presence of mitotic figures (Takahashi et al, 2000;de Souza et al, 2001). Dogs that were diagnosed with grades 1 and 2 mast cell tumour have extremely poor survival rate after surgery (Grano et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%