2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-28640-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Virtual intracranial EEG signals reconstructed from MEG with potential for epilepsy surgery

Abstract: Modelling the interactions that arise from neural dynamics in seizure genesis is challenging but important in the effort to improve the success of epilepsy surgery. Dynamical network models developed from physiological evidence offer insights into rapidly evolving brain networks in the epileptic seizure. A limitation of previous studies in this field is the dependence on invasive cortical recordings with constrained spatial sampling of brain regions that might be involved in seizure dynamics. Here, we propose … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This notion further suggests that virtual implantation using low-density EEG may aid the localization of the SOZ at sublobar resolution, regardless of the location of the epileptogenic focus. However, it is reasonable to assume that more advanced neurophysiological techniques (i.e., hdEEG or MEG) may further improve the overall performance of virtual intracranial implantation ( Cao et al, 2022 , Plummer et al, 2019 ). Further prospective studies on large patient populations will reveal whether EEG monitoring using hdEEG or MEG will provide an added value for the localization of the SOZ using virtual implantation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This notion further suggests that virtual implantation using low-density EEG may aid the localization of the SOZ at sublobar resolution, regardless of the location of the epileptogenic focus. However, it is reasonable to assume that more advanced neurophysiological techniques (i.e., hdEEG or MEG) may further improve the overall performance of virtual intracranial implantation ( Cao et al, 2022 , Plummer et al, 2019 ). Further prospective studies on large patient populations will reveal whether EEG monitoring using hdEEG or MEG will provide an added value for the localization of the SOZ using virtual implantation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of noninvasive brain stimulation is widespread in studies of neuroscience [125]. The non-invasive neuroscience methods are: transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), electroencephalography (EEG), magnetoencephalography (MEG), positron emission tomography (PET), functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), steady-state topography (SST), and others [126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134]. These non-invasive neuroscience methods are described in detail in Section 3.…”
Section: Classificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of non-invasive brain stimulation is widespread in studies of neuroscience [ 125 ]. The non-invasive neuroscience methods are: transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), electroencephalography (EEG), magnetoencephalography (MEG), positron emission tomography (PET), functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), steady-state topography (SST), and others [ 126 , 127 , 128 , 129 , 130 , 131 , 132 , 133 , 134 ]. These non-invasive neuroscience methods are described in detail in Section 3 .…”
Section: Brain and Biometric Affect Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%