2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00831.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Virtual friend or threat? The effects of facial expression and gaze interaction on psychophysiological responses and emotional experience

Abstract: The present study aimed to investigate the impact of facial expression, gaze interaction, and gender on attention allocation, physiological arousal, facial muscle responses, and emotional experience in simulated social interactions. Participants viewed animated virtual characters varying in terms of gender, gaze interaction, and facial expression. We recorded facial EMG, fixation duration, pupil size, and subjective experience. Subject's rapid facial reactions (RFRs) differentiated more clearly between the cha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
79
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
11
79
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We admit readily that we have no obvious explanation for these findings and, therefore, in the following, we can provide only some speculation upon this issue. There are previous results showing that, for females, eye contact with opposite-sex avatar faces is not as pleasant as eye contact with same-sex avatars (Schrammel et al, 2009). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…We admit readily that we have no obvious explanation for these findings and, therefore, in the following, we can provide only some speculation upon this issue. There are previous results showing that, for females, eye contact with opposite-sex avatar faces is not as pleasant as eye contact with same-sex avatars (Schrammel et al, 2009). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…However, our male participants did not show superior performance for a male's storytelling overall, but only when the gaze was direct. There is some evidence that motor resonance to facial expressions as measured by facial electromyography is stronger in the context of direct vs. averted gaze (Schrammel, Pannasch, Graupner, Mojzisch, & Velichkovsky, 2009;Soussignan et al, 2013) although this is not a consistent finding (see Mojzisch et al, 2006). In addition, in a brain imaging study, no effect of head and gaze direction was observed on the mirror neuron system activation (Schulte-Rüther, Markowitsch, Fink, & Piefke, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Eye contact, studies show, is necessary for facial mimicry to unfold (Schrammel, Pannasch, Graupner, Mojzisch, & Velichkovsky, 2009), and facial mimicry, in turn, is needed to accurately decode what another person is feeling (Maringer, Krumhuber, Fischer, & Niedenthal, 2011). According to Niedenthal and colleagues' Simulation of Smiles (SIMS) model (Niedenthal et al, 2010), brain coupling mediates the effect of facial mimicry on decoding accuracy, whereas eye contact moderates the effect.…”
Section: Positivity Resonance: Broaden-and-build In Sync With Othersmentioning
confidence: 96%