2019
DOI: 10.3828/ejlp.2019.12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Virtual exchange for (critical) digital literacy skills development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, whereas language curricula are generally designed with explicit reference to Here, we can perhaps look for inspiration to practitioners of virtual exchange who have long tied evaluation of learning to not only language development and intercultural competence, but also to the growth of (critical) digital literacies (e.g. Helm & Guth, 2010;Hauck, 2019).…”
Section: Component 3: Asynchronous Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, whereas language curricula are generally designed with explicit reference to Here, we can perhaps look for inspiration to practitioners of virtual exchange who have long tied evaluation of learning to not only language development and intercultural competence, but also to the growth of (critical) digital literacies (e.g. Helm & Guth, 2010;Hauck, 2019).…”
Section: Component 3: Asynchronous Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solving internet-related problems for the learners involved on and off campus would help, but is by no means enough. As Hauck (2019Hauck ( , 2020 has pointed out: VE is not exempt from the risk of cementing social and cultural inequalities offline and online.…”
Section: Conclusion and Implications For Future Research And Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A first observation is that earlier literature on telecollaboration was more detailed in terms of concrete activities than the later literature on virtual exchanges. Statements in current literature on the topic remain more on the level of goals, such as global citizenship, intercultural communication, social inclusion (Turula, Kurek, & Lewis, 2019), twenty-first century skills, learner agency (Kohn & Hoffstaedter, 2017), critical digital literacy skills (Hauck, 2019), (trans)languaging (Messina Dahlberg & Bagga-Gupta, 2014), learning to learn (Garc ıa-Esteban, Villarreal, & Bueno-Alastuey, 2019), and non-native speaker identity (Helm, 2018). All these are learning goals, not affordances.…”
Section: Virtual Exchangesmentioning
confidence: 99%