Virtual Ergonomics by Dassault Systèmes

Charland, Julie

doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-816713-7.00009-x

Cited by 5 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For a postural analysis of certain tasks, most of the studies reviewed used "3D CAD and Modeling" DHM tools according to the thermology of Demirel et al [21] such as Siemens JACK [8], IPS IMMA [10], Santos [19], Dessaults Systèmes DELMIA [20], and RAMISIS [9]. The task is applied to the model, either using experimental or predicted motion data.…”

Section: Human Posturementioning

confidence: 99%

Ergonomic Optimization of Human-Machine Systems in Virtual Environments – A Systematic Literature Review Identifying Research Gaps

2023

DS 125: Proceedings of the 34th Symposium Design for X (DFX2023)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Enhancing product ergonomics is becoming increasingly important in the development of human-machine systems. But it requires a high development effort due to costly iterations of physical prototypes and user studies. The use of digital human, product, and interaction models as well as an optimizer redesigning the product using ergonomic assessment and optimization algorithms has the potential of reducing this effort. Since there is a variety of methods and models for the ergonomic assessment and design optimization, a systematic literature review based on the PRISMA statement is presented, analyzing 22 relevant studies. The information of application context, ergonomic assessment methods including human posture, external and internal physical human stress, and product design methods were extracted. Research gaps were identified and further research projects were derived. These gaps involve the appropriate selection of ergonomic assessment measures and criteria, a formulation of an objective function based on the ergonomic assessment, and the selection of suitable design parameters for the ergonomic design optimization. These research questions are to be answered based on a specific use case which is to be selected.

show abstract

Section: Human Posturementioning

confidence: 99%

Ergonomic Optimization of Human-Machine Systems in Virtual Environments – A Systematic Literature Review Identifying Research Gaps

2023

DS 125: Proceedings of the 34th Symposium Design for X (DFX2023)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Anthropometric human models offer a realistic geometric representation of the human locomotor apparatus, to assess ergonomics in terms of space requirement analyses, reach analyses, visual analyses or manual handling tasks using ergonomic assessment methods like RULA (McAtamney and Nigel Corlett 1993) or EAWS (Schaub et al 2013). Examples of industrially used anthropometric human models are Siemens Jack (Raschke and Cort 2019), RAMSIS (Wirsching 2019), Virtual Ergonomics by Dassault Syst emes (Charland 2019), IPS IMMA (Hanson et al 2019)or EMA (Bauer et al 2019). Biomechanical human models provide a detailed representation of the human musculoskeletal locomotor apparatus and allow dynamic analyses of human movement in order to compute biomechanical quantities (like a muscle-and jointreaction forces).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Challenges in interaction modelling with digital human models – A systematic literature review of interaction modelling approaches

Wolf¹,

Miehling²,

Wartzack³

2020

Ergonomics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Digital human models (DHM) allow for a proactive ergonomic assessment of products by applying different models describing the user-product interaction. In engineering design, DHM tools are currently not established as computer-aided ergonomics tools, since (among other reasons) the interaction models are either cumbersome to use, unstandardised, time-demanding or not trustworthy. To understand the challenges in interaction modelling, we conducted a systematic literature review with the aim of identification, classification and examination of existing interaction models. A schematic user-product interaction model for DHM is proposed, abstracting existing models and unifying the corresponding terminology. Additionally, nine general approaches to proactive interaction modelling were identified by classifying the reviewed interaction models. The approaches are discussed regarding their scope, limitations, strength and weaknesses. Ultimately, the literature review revealed that prevalent interaction models cannot be considered unconditionally suitable for engineering design since none of them offer a satisfactory combination of genuine proactivity and universal validity.Practitioner summary: This contribution presents a systematic literature review conducted to identify, classify and examine existing proactive interaction modelling approaches for digital human models in engineering design. Ultimately, the literature review revealed that prevalent interaction models cannot be considered unconditionally suitable for engineering design since none of them offer a satisfactory combination of genuine proactivity and universal validity.

show abstract

Modeling and Simulation of Human Systems

Paul

2021

Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Virtual Ergonomics by Dassault Systèmes

Cited by 5 publications

References 7 publications

Ergonomic Optimization of Human-Machine Systems in Virtual Environments – A Systematic Literature Review Identifying Research Gaps

Ergonomic Optimization of Human-Machine Systems in Virtual Environments – A Systematic Literature Review Identifying Research Gaps

Challenges in interaction modelling with digital human models – A systematic literature review of interaction modelling approaches

Modeling and Simulation of Human Systems

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About