2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.dt.2018.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Virtual ballistic impact testing of Kevlar soft armor: Predictive and validated finite element modeling of the V 0 - V 100 probabilistic penetration response

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is concerned with improving the ballistic protective performance of a multiple ply soft armour system by selectively stacking dissimilar layers within the system. Literature indicates that the holistic ballistic performance of armour systems can be influenced by the constituent fabric properties but few studies capture trends in the fundamental impact response with these various properties [18,20,21] with most recent studies focusing on specific fabrics or modelling of them [22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is concerned with improving the ballistic protective performance of a multiple ply soft armour system by selectively stacking dissimilar layers within the system. Literature indicates that the holistic ballistic performance of armour systems can be influenced by the constituent fabric properties but few studies capture trends in the fundamental impact response with these various properties [18,20,21] with most recent studies focusing on specific fabrics or modelling of them [22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature indicates that the holistic ballistic performance of armor systems can be influenced by the constituent fabric properties, but few studies capture trends in the fundamental impact response with these various properties, 18,20,21 with most recent studies focusing on specific fabrics or the modeling of them. [22][23][24]…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a framework development perspective, it should be noted that a key ingredient to the success of this work stems from the generation of a comprehensive experimental test database (microstructure, material, performance) and a tightly integrated set of experiments and models, ensuring a consistent and seamless flow of data and insights back and forth between models and experiments. While this article has presented experimental validation of the probabilistic computational framework for one impact scenario (namely, fully clamped, single-ply fabric target impacted by a spherical projectile), Nilakantan et al (2018) has extended this framework for a very similar impact scenario that used a 0.22cal, 17-gr fragment-simulating projectile (FSP) and once again the model accurately predicted the experimental V 0 -V 100 curve. This framework can readily be extended to other continuousfilament weave architectures composed of materials such as UHMWPE (Spectra, Dyneema) and aramid (Kevlar, Twaron) that are impacted by different projectiles and bullets.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Muflahi et al [18] evaluated the capabilities of different element formulations and cohesive fracture models for delamination prediction of thin composite structures, using the commercial software LS-DYNA. Nilakantan [19] conducted the virtual ballistic impact testing of Kevlar soft armor in LS-DYNA and presented a fully validated and predictive probabilistic penetration modeling of a woven fabric through utilizing a finite element model with individually modeled yarns. However, for braided composites with more complicated fabrics architecture, the homogeneous ply-based modeling approach may lose the heterogeneous characteristics of the material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%