2017
DOI: 10.1186/s40168-017-0308-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Virome comparisons in wild-diseased and healthy captive giant pandas

Abstract: BackgroundThe giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) is a vulnerable mammal herbivore living wild in central China. Viral infections have become a potential threat to the health of these endangered animals, but limited information related to these infections is available.MethodsUsing a viral metagenomic approach, we surveyed viruses in the feces, nasopharyngeal secretions, blood, and different tissues from a wild giant panda that died from an unknown disease, a healthy wild giant panda, and 46 healthy captive an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
94
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
94
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A library was then constructed using a Nextera XT DNA Sample Preparation Kit (Illumina) and sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq platform with 250-bp paired-end reads with dual barcoding. Bioinformatics analysis was performed as described previously [9,10]. Briefly, paired-end reads of 250 bp generated by Illumina MiSeq were debarcoded, and the sequencing data were processed using in-house analysis pipeline running on a 32-node Linux cluster.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A library was then constructed using a Nextera XT DNA Sample Preparation Kit (Illumina) and sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq platform with 250-bp paired-end reads with dual barcoding. Bioinformatics analysis was performed as described previously [9,10]. Briefly, paired-end reads of 250 bp generated by Illumina MiSeq were debarcoded, and the sequencing data were processed using in-house analysis pipeline running on a 32-node Linux cluster.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on phylogenetic position, most viruses identified in the caecal content are likely to be associated with the rabbit diet or other commensal microorganisms, such as fungi and protozoa (Figure 2). To our knowledge, equivalent viral meta-transcriptomics analyses on caecal content have not been reported, although an abundance of plant and microorganism-associated viruses is consistent with the faecal viromes of other herbivores (Guan et al, 2018; Woo et al, 2014; Zhang et al, 2017). Importantly, we identified diverse novel viruses in rabbits – Racaecavirus and Orycavirus - that cluster with other vertebrate-associated viruses (in the Caliciviridae and the Picornaviridae , respectively) suggesting that the most likely hosts are the rabbits from which they were sampled.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Indeed, the seasonality clustering observed in this study, may suggest vector-borne transmission although others transmission routes cannot be ruled out. A zoonotic reservoir is also possible since DicVs have been detected in stools from various non-human primates (such as gorillas [24]) as well as giant pandas [25], and bats [26], which also raises the possibility of a faecal-oral or sylvatic transmission cycle. Furthermore, the presence of DicV sequences were recently reported in the blood of a fruit bat captured in 2015 from the Republic of Congo [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%