2016
DOI: 10.1111/trf.13498
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Virology, serology, and demography of hepatitis E viremic blood donors in South East England

Abstract: Viremic donors represent primary infection in older members of the community and reflect a widespread zoonotic in the United Kingdom. The two phylogenetic groups of HEV G3 display different pathogenicity and the more common Group 2 appears less adapted to humans. There are no objective demographic criteria that can identify donors at enhanced HEV risk.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

5
41
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(31 reference statements)
5
41
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In conclusion, our data indicate that these HEV IgG/total anti‐HEV assays are useful for examining seroprevalence and associated trends in seroprevalence with an interassay agreement of 84%; however, the disagreement among these assays indicates that there is an associated discordance rate or difference in target detection driving variability as seen by the heteroskedasticity evident among the IgG assays. The case for the IgM assays is worse since no IgM assay evaluated here demonstrated clinical utility in the blood donor population tested, although an IgM response in HEV RNA‐positive blood donors has been well characterized . These data suggest that more reliable information on prevalence may be obtained from using concordant reactive results from multiple assays.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In conclusion, our data indicate that these HEV IgG/total anti‐HEV assays are useful for examining seroprevalence and associated trends in seroprevalence with an interassay agreement of 84%; however, the disagreement among these assays indicates that there is an associated discordance rate or difference in target detection driving variability as seen by the heteroskedasticity evident among the IgG assays. The case for the IgM assays is worse since no IgM assay evaluated here demonstrated clinical utility in the blood donor population tested, although an IgM response in HEV RNA‐positive blood donors has been well characterized . These data suggest that more reliable information on prevalence may be obtained from using concordant reactive results from multiple assays.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…There have been several recent studies investigating the infectivity of HEV-contaminated blood components [1, 12, 27, 29, 44]. The likelihood of transmission is influenced by the donor VL and the residual plasma volume of the blood component, i.e., the infectious dose.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The median infectious dose resulting in HEV infection reported by Dreier et al [29] was 520,000 IU irrespective of recipient immune status. Data on infectious dose from Tedder et al [1, 44] suggest that infection is unlikely to occur at an infectious dose of < 19,000 IU [27]. Applying this information to data generated in an IBTS MP-24 experiment (VL of 130 IU/mL detected in 2/2 replicates), we could infer that a low plasma volume component (e.g., RBC with 13.5 mL plasma) tested in a MP-24 is unlikely to contain an infectious dose (i.e., ∼1,800 IU) sufficient to cause TT-HEV.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Occurrence of HEV viremia in healthy blood donors has been increasingly reported across the globe mainly from Europe [5], and China [1] where genotype 3 and 4 predominate. To explore the possibility of HEV viremia in healthy blood donors of Nepal, we collected blood samples along with demographic data from 581 healthy voluntary blood donors from central blood bank, Kathmandu, Nepal during February-March 2014.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%