2015
DOI: 10.1056/nejmc1413931
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Viremic Relapse after HIV-1 Remission in a Perinatally Infected Child

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
180
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 230 publications
(185 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
5
180
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the context of eradication studies, this underestimation of the HIV reservoir is misleading if the absence of detection is interpreted as the detection of absence. The "Boston" patients (97) and the "Mississippi baby" (98) confirmed that the latent reservoir can persist below the limit of detection of current assays, allowing the infection to recur months to years later. As with remission after cancer chemotherapy, although no residual malignant disease can be detected, it can persist and recur years later.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In the context of eradication studies, this underestimation of the HIV reservoir is misleading if the absence of detection is interpreted as the detection of absence. The "Boston" patients (97) and the "Mississippi baby" (98) confirmed that the latent reservoir can persist below the limit of detection of current assays, allowing the infection to recur months to years later. As with remission after cancer chemotherapy, although no residual malignant disease can be detected, it can persist and recur years later.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…During the curative strategies, the presence of cART will prevent CD4 ϩ T cells from becoming infected by residual virus. However, if any reservoirs of HIV-1 persist when cART is discontinued, a rebound in viremia is likely to eventually occur (3)(4)(5). For this reason, a CD8 ϩ T cell response capable of control must be developed in order to prevent residual latently infected CD4 ϩ T cells from reestablishing chronic infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of the “Mississippi Child,” a perinatally infected infant who received cART from 30 hours to 18 months of age, plasma virus levels remained below the limit of detection for more than 2 years after cART interruption (Persaud et al 2013). The frequency of latently infected cells in this child was at least 2.5 logs lower than in a typical treated adult, but the child experienced sudden viral rebound 27.6 months after cART discontinuation (Luzuriaga et al 2015; Hill et al 2016). What is particularly interesting in these “near cure” cases is that the HIV + individuals had very little adaptive immunity to HIV-1, either as a result of the transplant process or very early treatment (Henrich et al 2014; Persaud et al 2013).…”
Section: Challenges Of Reservoir Reductionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The latent reservoir decays slowly, with a t ½ of 3.6 years, so even prolonged cART cannot to eradicate the infection in a patient’s lifetime (Finzi 1999; Siliciano et al 2003; Strain et al 2003; Crooks et al 2015). Even in HIV + individuals who are treated early or who have extremely small reservoirs as a result of bone marrow transplantation, rebound can occur, and therefore these individuals must stay on cART indefinitely (Chun et al 1999; Kaufmann et al 2004; Persaud et al 2013; Henrich et al 2014; Luzuriaga et al 2015). …”
Section: Introduction: the Case For An Hiv-1 Curementioning
confidence: 99%