2016
DOI: 10.1172/jci80567
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring the latent reservoir in vivo

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
80
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
1
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This concept underlies the quantitative viral outgrowth assay (QVOA) that is considered to be the "gold-standard" method for measuring the latent reservoir. The important problem of measuring the latent reservoir is discussed in detail by Marta Massanella and Douglas Richman in this issue (21). Longitudinal measurements by the QVOA in patients on suppressive ART established that the half-life of the pool of latently infected resting CD4 + T cells is extremely long (3.7 years), thus requiring over 70 years of treatment to eradicate a pool of 10 6 cells (9, 10).…”
Section: The Latent Reservoir As a Barrier To Curementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This concept underlies the quantitative viral outgrowth assay (QVOA) that is considered to be the "gold-standard" method for measuring the latent reservoir. The important problem of measuring the latent reservoir is discussed in detail by Marta Massanella and Douglas Richman in this issue (21). Longitudinal measurements by the QVOA in patients on suppressive ART established that the half-life of the pool of latently infected resting CD4 + T cells is extremely long (3.7 years), thus requiring over 70 years of treatment to eradicate a pool of 10 6 cells (9, 10).…”
Section: The Latent Reservoir As a Barrier To Curementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quantitative virus outgrowth assay (QVOA) represents the "gold standard" [4][5][6], but this assay underestimates the true size of the functional reservoir due to incomplete induction by PHA stimulation. Ho et al [7] showed that the functional HIV-1 reservoir may be 60-fold larger than originally estimated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PCR based assays are also commonly used for quantifying the HIV-1 reservoir, but these assays overestimate the size of the functional reservoir because they cannot distinguish between replication-competent and defective viral genomes. Quantification of the HIV-1 reservoir by PCRbased methods typically give at least 100-fold higher numbers that the QVOA because of defective proviruses [4][5][6]. Many defective proviruses have large internal deletions [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Replication-competent HIV-1 can be measured by QVOA. These terminal detected by an assay for either p24 antigen or HIV RNA in the supernatant of these 12 co-cultures over a two-to three-week period [8]. Each well is read as negative or 13 positive, which means that replication-competent virus was present in at least one of the 14 cells in the well.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These challenges include: 1) QVOA requires that large volumes of blood be collected to 23 generate large numbers of Ficoll-purified peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), 24 which are generally further processed without freezing/thawing, into input resting CD4 + 25 T cells, 2) each assay takes weeks to complete and is expensive (∼$3,000), 3) substantial 26 personnel time is required for cell purification, culture and monitoring supernatants for 27 HIV replication, limiting test throughput to two to four QVOAs per lab per week, 4) 28 not all replication-competent virus is detected by a single QVOA [11], and 5) different 29 laboratories employ varying methods [8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%