2005
DOI: 10.1681/asn.2004121113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Viral Infection in the Renal Transplant Recipient

Abstract: Viruses are among the most common causes of opportunistic infection after transplantation and the most important. The risk for viral infection is a function of the specific virus encountered, the intensity of immune suppression used to prevent graft rejection, and other host factors governing susceptibility. Viral infection, both symptomatic and asymptomatic, causes the "direct effects" of invasive disease and "indirect effects," including immune suppression predisposing to other opportunistic infections and o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
181
0
15

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 191 publications
(198 citation statements)
references
References 203 publications
(73 reference statements)
2
181
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…A well-recognized complication of cytotoxic or immunosuppressive therapy is the reactivation of pathogenic viruses that have remained latent in the host following primary infection (1,2). Immunosuppression may also render patients more vulnerable to new viral infections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A well-recognized complication of cytotoxic or immunosuppressive therapy is the reactivation of pathogenic viruses that have remained latent in the host following primary infection (1,2). Immunosuppression may also render patients more vulnerable to new viral infections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 Apart from the direct effects of invasive disease, cytomegalovirus produces immunomodulatory effects, resulting in further immunosuppression and an increased risk of other opportunistic infections after transplant. 24 We conclude that renal allograft mucormycosis is a serious condition requiring early suspicion and recognition of the condition, and its aggressive management with surgery and antifungal medication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…All the patients in our study have received ganciclovir prophylaxis for CMV for a period of three months. Prophylaxis has been shown to be effective in reducing the incidence of CMV disease (17). There was a statistical significance between pre-transplant diabetes and CMV infection in the allograft recipients.…”
Section: Cytomegalovirusmentioning
confidence: 94%