1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-4238(96)00945-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Viral diseases causing the greatest economic losses to the tomato crop. II. The Tomato yellow leaf curl virus — a review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
138
0
16

Year Published

1998
1998
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 238 publications
(166 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
3
138
0
16
Order By: Relevance
“…The observation of a restricted range of ToYVSVsusceptible species, with predominance of species in the family Solanaceae, the variation in the expression of symptoms between susceptible species, and their variability with regard to susceptibility to different isolates of the virus are in accordance with reports for other begomovirus species that infect tomato plants, such as ToLCV (Stonor et al, 2003), ToLCSinV (Idris & Brown, 1998), CdTV (Brown & Nelson, 1988) and TYLCV (Picó et al, 1996). (Table 5).…”
Section: Toyvsv Host Speciessupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The observation of a restricted range of ToYVSVsusceptible species, with predominance of species in the family Solanaceae, the variation in the expression of symptoms between susceptible species, and their variability with regard to susceptibility to different isolates of the virus are in accordance with reports for other begomovirus species that infect tomato plants, such as ToLCV (Stonor et al, 2003), ToLCSinV (Idris & Brown, 1998), CdTV (Brown & Nelson, 1988) and TYLCV (Picó et al, 1996). (Table 5).…”
Section: Toyvsv Host Speciessupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Sinaloa tomato leaf curl virus -STLCV) (Idris & Brown, 1998), 11 to 12 days for ToLCBV-C (Muniyappa et al 2000), 11 to 20 days for TYLCV isolate from Jordan (Cohen & Nitzany, 1966;Mansour & Al-Musa, 1992), and 26 days for SLCV (Cohen et al, 1983). These differences in virus AAP, IAP, LP, and period of retention within the insect are expected because, besides the variations in the conditions of the various experiments, especially with respect to insect numbers and the manner by which those insects were handled, other variables, such as begomovirus species, geographic origin of the virus isolate and of the B. tabaci biotype B population might affect these parameters, as reported in studies involving other begomoviruses (Picó et al, 1996;Muniyappa et al, 2000).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Such a situation becomes more probable when those virus reservoirs are present in the same area with tomato crops. Although there is no definitive threshold number of those plant reservoirs, when their number becomes high enough they act as a potential source of the virus to tomato crops [4]. The infection of those crops may be enhanced by the favorable weather conditions of the region which activate the whitefly vectors for longer periods during the year [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV) is the most devastating disease infecting tomato in many tropical and subtropical regions causing yield loss up to 100% [4][5][6]. Currently, in Palestine the virus is widely infecting tomatoes in northern regions of the West Bank including the Jenin and the Tobas districts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diseases caused by TSWV and the complex of TYLCV-like viruses are two of the most devastating diseases that affect tomato cultivation in all tropical and subtropical areas worldwide (Picó et al 1996;Roselló et al 1996;Hanssen et al 2010). Genetic resistance has been identified for both viruses and transferred to tomato.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%