Violation of Grice’s Maxims and Ambiguity in English Linguistic Jokes

Abstract

The English believe that being English is first of all having a good sense of humor. Therefore, a shameful thing for them is to be regarded as a person with no sense of humor. Thus, English humor, which is very sophisticated, aristocratic and subtle, is widely used in their everyday life. This paper aims to find out the relationship between the violation of Grice's maxims and the ambiguity that induce humor and laughter in each case of violation.The present paper studies the types of ambiguity which are the most popular device in the process of creation of English linguistic verbal jokes matching them to the violation of Grice's maxims that form an important constituent of linguistic verbal jokes. First, Grice's Cooperative Principles, their violation and the way how they are violated are considered. Then, ambiguity in English linguistic jokes is defined and categorized. After that, ten randomly chosen English linguistic jokes (five lexical-semantic and five structuralsyntactic jokes respectively) are analyzed demonstrating the violation and the manner of violation of Grice's maxims in them.If people said exactly what they meant, and if people understood their interlocutors' intention and interpreted what they heard correctly, there would be no linguistic humor. According to American philosopher Paul Grice, people observe certain cooperative principle to conduct successful interaction. Thus, Grice suggests four main maxims (or super maxims) viz. maxims of quantity, quality, relation and manner within his famous Cooperative Principles, the violation of which can cause misunderstanding that is one of the main sources of linguistic jokes. The above four super maxims can be violated in four ways: 1) quietly and unostentatiously, 2) by opting out of a maxim, 3) coping with a clash between maxims, and 4) flouting a maxim in order to exploit it. (Grice, 1975, pp. 45-49).In linguistics, ambiguity is defined as words, phrases or sentences that express more than one meaning. (Crystal, 2008, p.22). According to another definition, ambiguity is a construction which admits more than one interpretation. Salvatore Attardo et al. (1994), in their study of a corpus of two thousand jokes, found out that four hundred and thirty-one of the four hundred and forty-one verbal jokes, i. e. about ninety-eight percent, were ambiguity based. Ambiguity itself falls two main types -lexical-semantic and structuralsyntactic. In the first case, any word or sentence has more than one meaning, in the second case, the role of any word or its relation with other constituents in the sentence has more than one possibility.In linguistic jokes, the humorous effect is achieved through lexical-semantic or structural-syntactic ambiguity where Grice's maxims are violated. Thus, the main conclusion will be as follows:In the first line of two-linear verbal linguistic jokes, Grice's maxims of quantity (make your contribution as informative as required) and manner (avoid ambiguity) are violated. In the second line (punch line), Grice's maxims of relat...

A Pragmatic Analysis of Implicatures in Covid-19 Coronavirus English Jokes

“…According to this theory, even when the maxims violate Grice's CP principle, they are still communicative (Hoicka, 2014: 223). Ruskin's humour CP is just Grice's CP and maxims but put in the context of jokes-telling (Mooney, 2004:904) The next study is that of Taghiyev (2017) on "Violation of Grice's Maxims and Ambiguity in English Jokes". The study aims at finding out the connection between Grice's maxims violation and the humour that is stimulated by the types of ambiguity.…”

Conversational Implicature Analysis in “Kingdom of Heaven” Movie Script by William Monahan

“…The utterance of Godfrey in conversation above did not obey the cooperative principle. He flouted the maxims of manner as his answer gave the ambiguity (Taghiyev, 2017) whether Balian could erase his sins and those of his wife or not. It must be generalized implicature because from the utterance we need to know the context that Godfrey did not actually know whether sins could be erased or not in Jerusalem because the main reason for him to go to Jerusalem was the kingdom.…”

Analisis Maksim Perbualan Grice Dalam Soal Jawab TV3

“…Dalam memperlihatkan kepatuhan dan ketidakpatuhan MP pelbagai korpus digunakan antaranya sesi temuduga, filem, novel, komunikasi dan sebagainya. Antara kajian yang dilakukan ialah Ephratt (2011), Phosravizadeh dan Sadehvandi (2011), Fadhly (2012), Al-Saedi (2013), Bilal dan Naeem (2013), Chaipreukkul (2013), Hanifah (2013), Sobhani dan Saghebi (2014), Shuwei (2014), Tajabadi, Dowlatabadi dan Mehri (2014), Abari dan Lotfi (2015), Harared (2015), Seftika (2015), Samosir (2015), Fahmi (2016), Mohamad, Mohamed dan Mohamed (2017), Msuya dan Massanga (2017), Taghiyev (2017), Xioaqin 2017dan Ayaserh dan Razali (2018).…”

“…Kajian Taghiyev (2017) tentang jenaka linguistik Inggeris berfokus pada pencabulan MP dan ketaksaan. Dapatan memperlihatkan pencabulan maksim kuantiti dan cara berlaku pada dua baris pertama jenaka lisan manakala pada dua baris kedua jenaka, pencabulan maksim hubungan dan cara berlaku.…”