2017
DOI: 10.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n6p3491
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vigor tests in assessing the quality of signal grass seeds

Abstract: The correct assessment of the physiological quality of seed lots is necessary for the quality control program of companies. For such purpose, tests that detect differences in the physiological potential of seed lots and that meet the minimum market requirements. Thus, the study was conducted towards assessing the efficiency of laboratory tests in differentiating the quality of Brachiaria brizantha cv. Xaraés seed lots. Seeds from nine lots were assessed regarding water content, germination, first germination c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
6
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The effectiveness of the traditional accelerated aging test or the saturated saline solution test for seed vigor evaluation was also observed through the correlation between the results of the accelerated aging test and the results obtained in evaluation of seed lot quality, especially when correlated with the seedling emergence test (Figure 1). The correlation of data of a vigor test with seedling emergence in the field is crucial for the test to be considered effective, since a vigor test should not only classify lots into different vigor classes, but should also be as near as possible to results of seedling emergence in the field (Marcos-Filho, 2015a;Melo et al, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effectiveness of the traditional accelerated aging test or the saturated saline solution test for seed vigor evaluation was also observed through the correlation between the results of the accelerated aging test and the results obtained in evaluation of seed lot quality, especially when correlated with the seedling emergence test (Figure 1). The correlation of data of a vigor test with seedling emergence in the field is crucial for the test to be considered effective, since a vigor test should not only classify lots into different vigor classes, but should also be as near as possible to results of seedling emergence in the field (Marcos-Filho, 2015a;Melo et al, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seedling emergence in the field was used as a reference for the selection of vigor tests (MELO et al, 2017;SILVA et al, 2017), and it was possible to classify the performance of the lots in descending order of vigor from 1 to 10 and group them into four classes of vigor: high (lots 1 and 2), high-medium (lots from 3 to 7), low-medium (lots 8 and 9), and low (lot 10). This criterion was used because one purpose of the vigor tests is to evaluate the physiological quality of the seeds to differentiate the lots in terms of vigor level and predict seedling emergence in the field (COIMBRA et al, 2007;MARCOS FILHO, 2015a;OLIVEIRA et al, 2014;MELO et al, 2017;SILVA et al, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The correlation of data from a vigor test with the emergence of seedlings in the field is crucial to consider the test as efficient because, in addition to classifying lots into different vigor classes, it should be as close as possible to emergence of seedlings in the field (LOPES;FRANKE, 2010;MARCOS FILHO, 2015a;MELO et al, 2017;SILVA et al, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that the tests of interest in the evaluation of lots in seed analysis laboratories, besides ranking the lots at vigor levels, must present results correlated with seedling emergence in the field (Marcos Filho, 2015). Therefore, seedling emergence in the field was used as reference for the selection of vigor tests (Melo et al, 2017;Silva et al, 2017). The performance of the lots was classified in descending order of vigor, from 1 to 10, grouping them into four vigor classes: high (lots 1 and 2), medium high (lots 3 to 7), medium low (lots 8 and 9), and low (lot 10).…”
Section: Lotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of the lots was classified in descending order of vigor, from 1 to 10, grouping them into four vigor classes: high (lots 1 and 2), medium high (lots 3 to 7), medium low (lots 8 and 9), and low (lot 10). This criterion was used because one of the purposes of the vigor tests is to evaluate the physiological quality of the seeds attempting to differentiate lots regarding the vigor level and to predict seedling emergence in the field (Marcos Filho, 2015;Oliveira et al, 2014;Melo et al, 2017;Silva et al, 2017).…”
Section: Lotsmentioning
confidence: 99%