2004
DOI: 10.1348/0144665031752989
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Viewing behaviour of spider phobics and non‐phobics in the presence of threat and safety stimuli

Abstract: Our results are consistent with previous research employing reaction time to a neutral stimulus as dependent measure. In addition, our results suggest that phobics scan the environment as part of safety behaviour. We suggest that exposure treatments to reduce spider phobia may be facilitated by encouraging patients to stop environmental scanning.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
17
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(17 reference statements)
1
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Trials lasted 3 minutes, and increased maintenance of gaze on the spider, as well as the room’s exit, was found in high versus low spider fearful individuals. The sustained maintenance of gaze on real spiders found byLange et al (2004) contrasts with the sustained avoidance of gaze on mere images of spiders found over 3 s (Hermans et al, 1999; Rinck & Becker, 2006), 9 s (Pflugshaupt et al, 2007) and 60 s (Rinck & Becker, 2006) trials. One might conclude that Lange et al’s findings cast doubt on the clinical significance of attentional avoidance of threatening images, because the phenomenon may be limited to encounters with mere representations of threat.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Trials lasted 3 minutes, and increased maintenance of gaze on the spider, as well as the room’s exit, was found in high versus low spider fearful individuals. The sustained maintenance of gaze on real spiders found byLange et al (2004) contrasts with the sustained avoidance of gaze on mere images of spiders found over 3 s (Hermans et al, 1999; Rinck & Becker, 2006), 9 s (Pflugshaupt et al, 2007) and 60 s (Rinck & Becker, 2006) trials. One might conclude that Lange et al’s findings cast doubt on the clinical significance of attentional avoidance of threatening images, because the phenomenon may be limited to encounters with mere representations of threat.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…For example, Lange, Tierney, Reinhardt-Rutland, and Vivekananda-Schmidt (2004) presented a live spider to individuals high and low in spider fear. The spider was presented on either side of a television presenting a program that participants were instructed to watch carefully.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, and based on a multidimensional scaling approach, Cavanagh and Davey (2001) have proposed that the two attentional biases -one towards threat and the other away from it -can be regarded as outcomes of a general preference for both threat and safety information in phobia. Supporting this idea, it has been demonstrated that spider phobics -when placed in a room with a live spider and a single exit door -show an attentional bias towards both the spider and the door (Lange, Tierney, Reinhardt-Rutland, & Vivekananda-Schmidt, 2004;Thorpe & Salkovskis, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In contrast to the large number of studies based on cognitive paradigms such as emotional stroop or visual dot probe tasks, relatively few studies used oculomotor data to investigate the behavior of patients with anxiety disorders (e.g., Bradley, Mogg, & Millar, 2000;Horley, Williams, Gonsalvez, & Gordon, 2003;Lange et al, 2004;Miltner, Krieschel, Hecht, Trippe, & Weiss, 2004;Pflugshaupt et al, 2005;Rinck, Reinecke, Ellwart, Heuer, & Becker, 2005). This is surprising as eye movement patterns are thought to reflect attentional processes more directly than cognitive paradigms, since the former are not mediated by verbal or manual responses (Bryant, Harvey, Gordon, & Barry, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the majority of these tasks, slides that have a range of objects in them (including a picture of a spider) are shown to individuals who vary in spider fear (Gerdes, Alpers, and Pauli, 2008; Rinck and Becker, 2006; Pflugshaupt et al, 2005; Lange, Tierney, Reinharnd-Rutland, & Vivekananda-Schmidt, 2004). The data has suggested that spider phobics initially fixate faster on spider stimuli and then avoid them (Pflugshaupt et al, 2005; Rinck and Becker.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%