2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2006.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

To look or not to look at threat?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The absence of a clear clinical diagnosis for SP by means of a clinical interview in our sample of spider-fearful individuals might limit the validity of our findings. However, mean SPQ and FSQ scores in spider-fearful individuals were very high and correspond to clinical sample means (Pflugshaupt et al, 2007 ; Müller et al, 2011 ; Fisler et al, 2013 ; Gerdes and Alpers, 2014 ; Peperkorn et al, 2014 ; Soravia et al, 2014 ), suggesting that our results can be generalized to clinically significant spider phobia. Furthermore, a closer inspection of demographic data revealed that most of the spider-fearful participants indicated at least a moderate spider fear that was perceived as disturbing and accompanied by clear avoidance behavior in real life environment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The absence of a clear clinical diagnosis for SP by means of a clinical interview in our sample of spider-fearful individuals might limit the validity of our findings. However, mean SPQ and FSQ scores in spider-fearful individuals were very high and correspond to clinical sample means (Pflugshaupt et al, 2007 ; Müller et al, 2011 ; Fisler et al, 2013 ; Gerdes and Alpers, 2014 ; Peperkorn et al, 2014 ; Soravia et al, 2014 ), suggesting that our results can be generalized to clinically significant spider phobia. Furthermore, a closer inspection of demographic data revealed that most of the spider-fearful participants indicated at least a moderate spider fear that was perceived as disturbing and accompanied by clear avoidance behavior in real life environment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…However, from the few studies that did employ longer trials, it appears that trends present in the initial maintenance of attention continue over a larger time scale. For example, the present finding of decreased maintenance of gaze on threat in spider phobia was found to hold throughout the course of longer trials (9 s: Pflugshaupte et al, 2007; 60 s: Rinck & Becker, 2006). Also, the present finding of increased initial maintenance of gaze on threat in PTSD was found to continue over 10 s trials (Kimble et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Trials lasted 3 minutes, and increased maintenance of gaze on the spider, as well as the room’s exit, was found in high versus low spider fearful individuals. The sustained maintenance of gaze on real spiders found byLange et al (2004) contrasts with the sustained avoidance of gaze on mere images of spiders found over 3 s (Hermans et al, 1999; Rinck & Becker, 2006), 9 s (Pflugshaupt et al, 2007) and 60 s (Rinck & Becker, 2006) trials. One might conclude that Lange et al’s findings cast doubt on the clinical significance of attentional avoidance of threatening images, because the phenomenon may be limited to encounters with mere representations of threat.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Several methodological issues might have contributed to these inconsistent findings: First, phobic stimulation might engage an avoidance tendency, as postulated in the attention-avoidance hypothesis [16] , and/or overload the encoding capacities interfering with subsequent detailed processing of phobia-relevant information. In fact, previous eye movement data showed that individuals with specific phobia tend to avoid a detailed perceptual analysis of their feared objects after an increased initial orienting [17] [18] . Second, the poorer quality of cognitive representations and reduced memory performance for phobic stimuli might result from short intervals between initial stimulus presentation and the memory test.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%