2016 14th International Conference on Control, Automation, Robotics and Vision (ICARCV) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/icarcv.2016.7838774
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

View planning for 3D shape reconstruction of buildings with unmanned aerial vehicles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to model-free exploration methods that focus on autonomy and real-time capability in unknown environments, model-based path planning algorithms rely on an available proxy model of the environment and focus on estimating a subsequent optimal path to maximize the coverage and accuracy of the object globally [10,11,[35][36][37][38]. In contrary to active modeling, these explore-and-exploit methods do not receive any feedback from the acquired images during the exploitation flight, which demands high attention to the applied heuristics being used for generating the refinement path.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast to model-free exploration methods that focus on autonomy and real-time capability in unknown environments, model-based path planning algorithms rely on an available proxy model of the environment and focus on estimating a subsequent optimal path to maximize the coverage and accuracy of the object globally [10,11,[35][36][37][38]. In contrary to active modeling, these explore-and-exploit methods do not receive any feedback from the acquired images during the exploitation flight, which demands high attention to the applied heuristics being used for generating the refinement path.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the execution of the optimized path is easy and fast for any kind of UAV by simply navigating alongside the optimized waypoints. The prior model can either be based on an existing map with height information [36] or is generated by photogrammetric reconstructions from a preceding manual flight at a safe altitude or via standard flight planning methods (e.g., regular grids or circular trajectories) [10,11] and is usually expressed by a set of discrete 3D points in a voxel space [10,11,37,40] or by volumetric surfaces, such as triangulated meshes [35,36,38,41]. In order to define appropriate views for the optimized trajectory, camera viewpoint hypotheses are either regularly sampled in the free 3D airspace [10,37] resulting in 3D camera graphs, or are sparsely sampled in a 2D view manifold [38] or in skeleton sets [42] around the object.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flying distances computed by the proposed method in this paper are 425.6m and 466.2m for the two target structures, respectively. The distances of the inspection paths are 507.7m and 587.5m using the previous methods [5][11] that solves the TSP after applying the viewpoint-based methods to find the viewpoints (labeled as VPP-TSP). The discrete viewpoints based greedy method, a simple but robust baseline [15][11] that iteratively adds the most cost effective viewpoints, planned the path with the traveling distance of 531.0m and 687.1m.…”
Section: A Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• a novel sampling-based coverage planning framework that is natively suitable for model-based, continuous CPP problem with UAV visual inspection, improved from our previous discrete viewpoint-based planning framework [1] [5]. • flexible and reconfigurable design of the planning framework such that the modules (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7] discusses the setup of a UAV outdoors but adding an obstacle avoiding system. Similarly, [8] employs a freely available 2-D map of buildings in order to construct a rough 3-D model and inspect and refine it with a UAV. Bircher et al [9] focus on structural inspection in their work, and they employ a two-step optimization paradigm to find good viewpoints.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%