2019
DOI: 10.3390/rs11131550
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic and Semantically-Aware 3D UAV Flight Planning for Image-Based 3D Reconstruction

Abstract: Small-scaled unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) emerge as ideal image acquisition platforms due to their high maneuverability even in complex and tightly built environments. The acquired images can be utilized to generate high-quality 3D models using current multi-view stereo approaches. However, the quality of the resulting 3D model highly depends on the preceding flight plan which still requires human expert knowledge, especially in complex urban and hazardous environments. In terms of safe flight plans, practi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 11 shows the camera locations in missions 1 and 2, where we can see the short distances between camera locations at the turning parts and at the two ends of the flight lines. This narrow baseline would lead to poor image reconstruction results as reported in a previous study [56]. To investigate the elevation differences in different geomorphic environments, we used the orthophoto as a reference and manually divided the study site into zone 1 (intertidal area and dry beach with no vegetation) and zone 2 (steep slope with dense vegetation).…”
Section: Comparative Quality Assessment Of Lidar and Image-based Poinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 11 shows the camera locations in missions 1 and 2, where we can see the short distances between camera locations at the turning parts and at the two ends of the flight lines. This narrow baseline would lead to poor image reconstruction results as reported in a previous study [56]. To investigate the elevation differences in different geomorphic environments, we used the orthophoto as a reference and manually divided the study site into zone 1 (intertidal area and dry beach with no vegetation) and zone 2 (steep slope with dense vegetation).…”
Section: Comparative Quality Assessment Of Lidar and Image-based Poinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first part of the discussion should reflect on the interpretation of the result data that were obtained with the use of the new set of tests. The differences between the design values and the ones measured by the MS50 surveying instrument, as a reference data, can be used to assess the accuracy of the UAV mission, e.g., in the case of separation from infrastructure, obstacles [31,32,36], ensuring appropriate shooting distances, etc. The differences between the design values and those that were derived from the data stored in the LOG files of the UAV on-board computers allow for determining the internal accuracy of the on-board computer, i.e., the permissible values at which the planned tasks are considered to be fulfilled by its software.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [13], the authors introduce a method for flight planning that focuses on the image based 3D reconstruction, while also considering environmental limits, like no-fly zones. They show that their proposed method is able to compute flight paths that cover the structure of interest well for object resolutions of few centimeters.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%