Videoconferencing, New Public Management, and Organizational Reform in the Judiciary

Abstract

Videoconference technology allows interactions between citizens and their governments to be managed without systematic co‐presence. It is a relatively discrete innovation, which has been introduced into bureaucracies all over the world, but still remains underanalyzed and as a consequence, underestimated in terms of its impact. This article analyzes the introduction and institutionalization of remote hearings in French courtrooms to shed light on the emergence of videoconferencing technology as a new way of organizing trials, changing the format by which justice is carried out. The article reviews the existing literature, outlines the theoretical framework and methodology, and then presents the results, primarily concerning the history of the introduction of videoconferencing in French jurisdictions. Four main points of discussion emerge: the way in which videoconferencing is designed and the reasons put forward to justify its suitability in the judicial sector; its relationship with the efficiency programs underway in the justice system as part of wider New Public Management reform; the tensions and friction points between a pragmatic approach to innovation and the traditional judicial approach; and finally the case of personal appearance as an example of adjustments operated on judiciary standards by the introduction of videoconferencing. We close by considering videoconferencing as an instrument of public action, that is, a technological tool that has progressively realized a public policy objective, in this case reducing the need to escort detained personnel.

E-justice in Switzerland and Brazil: Paths and Experiences

“…The literature has shown the importance of emergent ICTs applied to the judiciary: videoconference in remote hearings in French courts; 42 online dispute resolution in Brazil; 43 bringing the courts closer to citizens through the use of trials live webstreaming 44 and social networks such as blog, Twitter, Facebook, 45 YouTube; Linkedln. 46 These new technologies can contribute to increase confidence in the judiciary.…”

Digitalizing the commercial courts: between promises and pitfalls

“…37 Schmitz 2019. 38 Mason 1978Dumoulin & Licoppe 2016;Procopiuck 2018;Geens 2017. 39 European Commission 2020 is that new technologies can hasten the diffusion of legal and judicial information while increasing its centralization and transparency.…”

Towards e‐judicial services in Malawi: Implications for justice delivery

“…It has been noted that while ICTs have been embraced in some courts in a few countries, some kinds of technologies are encouraged, whereas others are banned or not accepted by legislation (Hunter, ). ICT solutions in courts range from the use of simple videoconferencing (Gomes et al, ; Dumoulin & Licoppe, ) to cyber courts and simple electronic controls for creating and locating documents as well as fully electronic processes and judgments (Freeman, ).…”