Video context-dependent effects in recognition memory

Isarida, Takeo; Kubota, Takayuki; Nakajima, Saki; Yagi, Kosei; Yamamoto, Aoi; Higuma, Miyoko

doi:10.1016/j.jml.2020.104113

Cited by 9 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 51 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This is because the failure may be driven by many factors that are external to the research question under investigation: differences in the population and/or language studied, the natural variability in the dependent variable, lab settings, equipment, and protocols can come together to lead to very different outcomes. Indeed, it is possible that when it comes to studying subtle and highly variable aspects of human (IR)REPRODUCIBILITY IN PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHOLINGUISTICS (IR)REPRODUCIBILITY IN PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHOLINGUISTICS (2020), Brandt et al (2020), Brewer et al (2021), Bristol and Rossano (2020), Brothers and Kuperberg (2021), Brysbaert (2019), Bürki et al (2020), Chan et al (2020), Chetail (2020), Collins et al (2020), Corps and Rabagliati (2020), Dıéez-Álamo et al (2020), Falandays et al (2020), Fellman et al (2020), Floccia et al (2020), Fox et al (2020), Fujita and Cunnings (2020), Gagné et al (2020), Garnham et al (2020), Günther, Nguyen, et al (2020), Günther, Petilli, et al (2020), Hesse and Benz (2020), Hollis (2020), Humphreys et al (2020), Hwang and Shin (2019), Isarida et al (2020), Jäger et al (2020), Johns et al (2020), Kaula and Henson (2020), Lauro et al (2020), Lelonkiewicz et al (2020), Li et al (2020), Liang et al (2021), McKinley and Benjamin (2020),…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Share the code, not just the data: A case study of the reproducibility of articles published in the Journal of Memory and Language under the open data policy

Laurinavichyute¹,

Vasishth²

2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In 2019 the Journal of Memory and Language instituted an open data and code policy; this policy requires that, as a rule, code and data be released at the latest upon publication. Does this policy lead to reproducible results? We looked at whether 57 papers published between 2019 and 2021 were reproducible, in the sense that the published summary statistics should be possible to regenerate given the data, and given the code, when code was provided. We found that for 10 out of the 57 papers, data sets were inaccessible; 29 of the remaining 47 papers provided code, of which 16 were reproducible. Of the 18 papers that did not provide code, one was reproducible. Overall, the reproducibility rate was about 30%. This estimate is similar to the ones reported for psychology, economics, and other areas, but it is probably possible to do better. We provide some suggestions on how reproducibility can be improvedin future work.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Share the code, not just the data: A case study of the reproducibility of articles published in the Journal of Memory and Language under the open data policy

Laurinavichyute¹,

Vasishth²

2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…There are some concerns that sustained passive consumption of shortform videos may impact attention span (e.g., Siehoff, 2023); future passive SMU research could explore if these concerns are valid. For example, short-form videos may worsen viewers' mood by evoking a sense of fatigue due to nonverbal or informational overload (Bailenson, 2021;Isarida et al, 2020). Why and how exactly the message modality of shortform videos could impact well-being during or after passive SMU is an intriguing question and remains an important area for future research.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Unravelling passive social media use through screenomes

Yee,

Krause,

Meier

et al. 2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The active-passive framework to social media use and well-being promised nuanced insights, yet effects of passive use have been mixed. One reason could be the enormous heterogeneity of the ‘passive use’ concept, which encompasses various social media features, actions, and contents. This study applies the conceptual lenses of the hierarchical CMC taxonomy and social media content genres to unpack and explore this heterogeneity of passive social media use. We use a random sample of smartphone screenshots (‘screenomics’) drawn from 703,827 sequential screenshots collected from 20 participants over a two-week period to content analyze 10,000 screenshots. Results reveal substantial heterogeneity and patterns within passive use across four analytical levels: branded application, feature, modality, and content topics/genres. As the effects of social media on well-being may often be caused by content or design features, our study provides insights into how passive use can be broken down into more meaningful units of analysis.

show abstract

“…We selected video contexts consisting of moving pictures with sound based on the protocol of Smith and Manzano (2010). The video context functions not only as local environmental context similar to other computer contexts, such as background colour and background pictures, but also as global environmental context, similar to place context (Isarida et al, 2020; Smith and Manzano, 2010). The present study investigated whether video contexts would facilitate paired-associate learning in a manner similar to that found for place contexts.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Facilitation effect of incidental environmental context on the computer screen for paired-associate learning

Isarida

Isarida²,

Kubota

et al. 2021

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Three experiments, in which a total of 198 undergraduates engaged, investigate whether the incidental environmental context on the computer screen influences paired-associate learning. Experiment 1 compared the learning of foreign and native language words between a constant context condition, where the stimulus and response pairs were presented twice on the same 5-s video background context, and a varied context condition, where the pairs were presented twice on different video contexts. Repetition in the same context resulted in better learning than in different contexts, evaluated with a paper-and-pencil test. Experiment 2 investigated learning of paired-associate foreign and native words in the same video-contexts, or photograph-contexts, or on a neutral gray background. Both the video and the photograph contexts equally facilitated the paired-associate learning compared to the gray background. Experiment 3 investigated whether the incidental environmental context similarly facilitated face-name paired-associate learning. We added a new condition of spot illustrations, and a second testing one day later. The repetition of face-name pairs within the same complex incidental environmental context on the computer screen (either video or photograph background) facilitated the paired-associate learning. There was no significant difference in learning performance between video and photograph background contexts, which were significantly better than gray or spot illustration backgrounds which did not differ from each other. The retention interval did not interact with the effect of the background. The present results show that repetition within the same video or photograph context, covering the entire background of the video screen on which each item pair was superimposed, facilitates paired-associate learning.

show abstract

Video context-dependent effects in recognition memory

Cited by 9 publications

References 51 publications

Share the code, not just the data: A case study of the reproducibility of articles published in the Journal of Memory and Language under the open data policy

Share the code, not just the data: A case study of the reproducibility of articles published in the Journal of Memory and Language under the open data policy

Unravelling passive social media use through screenomes

Facilitation effect of incidental environmental context on the computer screen for paired-associate learning

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About