2007
DOI: 10.1097/01.nnd.0000294928.99048.9b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Video as a Strategy to Evaluate and Assist Clinical Teachers With Student Assessment

Abstract: The assessment of the clinical competence of nursing students requires expertise in nursing as well as skills in student assessment. The development of these student assessment skills is dependent on the preparation of the clinical teacher. The results of this pilot study indicate that video can be one successful tool in evaluating the assessment skills of clinical teachers. Video also may be useful as a staff development tool by providing a nonthreatening way for clinical teachers to familiarize themselves wi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Information about recording methods was also lacking. Field note rigour was rarely mentioned, and no study described video or audio recording of 'real time' observation -a recording method potentially allowing more in-depth analysis than is possible using field notes alone (Kevin et al, 2007;Latvala et al, 2000). There was insufficient subsequent detail in any paper to be confident about findings being attributable to the direct observation data independent of non-observation data.…”
Section: Analysis Of Study Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Information about recording methods was also lacking. Field note rigour was rarely mentioned, and no study described video or audio recording of 'real time' observation -a recording method potentially allowing more in-depth analysis than is possible using field notes alone (Kevin et al, 2007;Latvala et al, 2000). There was insufficient subsequent detail in any paper to be confident about findings being attributable to the direct observation data independent of non-observation data.…”
Section: Analysis Of Study Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%