Observation of interprofessional collaborative practice in primary care teams: An integrative literature review

Morgan, Sonya; Pullon, Sue; McKinlay, Eileen

doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.03.008

Cited by 311 publications

(280 citation statements)

References 47 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

219

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Regarding communication, which also appears as a positive reference behavior in the Relating to other agents category, the literature indicates that it allows exchange of information among the team components (26) , facilitating comprehensive care and improved quality (21,27) while promoting collaborative work and integration of distinct knowledge (14) . Shared communication is a crucial tool for interprofessional collaboration, which facilitates teamwork (4,14) and contributes to enable coherent care to the patients' demands (14,21,27) . In this sense, sharing information among professionals and the development of collaborative behaviors among them are encouraged (28) .…”

Section: () the Patient Ends Up Injured He Should Have A Better Smentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Teamwork requires more than gathering different professionals in the same working environment (2) ; and, therefore, it must have effective collaboration and communication among the team agents, knowledge exchange, and complementarity of actions. It is important to emphasize that interprofessional collaboration contributes to improving the quality of patient care (4) . Addressing this topic, the contributions related to the proposal of concept and typology of teams, integration, and grouping stand out.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Teamwork in a coronary care unit: facilitating and hindering aspects

Goulart

Camelo

Simões

et al. 2016

Rev. esc. enferm. USP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective:To identify, within a multidisciplinary team, the facilitating and hindering aspects for teamwork in a coronary care unit. Method: A descriptive study, with qualitative and quantitative data, was carried out in the coronary care unit of a public hospital. The study population consisted of professionals working in the unit for at least one year. Those who were on leave or who were not located were excluded. The critical incident technique was used for data collection, by means of semi-structured interviews. For data analysis, content analysis and the critical incident technique were applied. Results: Participants were 45 professionals: 29 nursing professionals; 11 physicians; 4 physical therapists; and 1 psychologist. A total of 49 situations (77.6% with negative references); 385 behaviors (54.2% with positive references); and 182 consequences emerged (71.9% with negative references). Positive references facilitate teamwork, whereas negative references hinder it. A collaborative/communicative interprofessional relationship was evidenced as a facilitator; whereas poor collaboration among agents/inadequate management was a hindering aspect. Conclusion: Despite the prevalence of negative situations and consequences, the emphasis on positive behaviors reveals the efforts the agents make in order to overcome obstacles and carry out teamwork.

show abstract

Section: () the Patient Ends Up Injured He Should Have A Better Smentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Teamwork in a coronary care unit: facilitating and hindering aspects

Goulart

Camelo

Simões

et al. 2016

Rev. esc. enferm. USP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The delivery of high-quality and safe health care services requires interprofessional collaboration (IPC), as manifested by a multidisciplinary team that works in a collaborative and integrated manner to achieve optimal health outcomes [1,2].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Benefits and Challenges of Interprofessional Education Assessment for Health Care Professionals

Tan¹,

Jiang²

2017

Korean Med Educ Rev

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Interprofessional education (IPE) fosters effective team-based collaborative practice among members of different health care professions to advance high-quality and safe patient care. Although the importance of IPE has been recognized and IPE initiatives have expanded rapidly in the past decades, substantial difficulties in IPE assessment still exist. At present, a lack of consensus on the optimal approach to IPE assessment contributes to uncertainty about the level of attainment of collaborative team performance. This paper aims to provide an overview of the benefits and current challenges associated with IPE assessment. Furthermore, a multifactor model with an assessment matrix and assessment blueprints from a recent study is briefly discussed. We also provide examples of assessment blueprints for the team management of stroke patient discharge covering a competency examination at the levels of individuals, the team, and the task.

show abstract

“…The article's overall goal has been to describe in detail a common communicative practice in interprofessional collaboration in acute care, the patient case review, and to frame it as collective sensemaking (Weick et al, 2005;Weick, 1979bWeick, , 1995. This makes explicit the link-or even the equivalence-between communicative action and interprofessional collaboration (Morgan, Pullon, & McKinlay, 2015), thus adding to ongoing conversations about the determinants of successful collaboration . Rather than an input to collaboration, we argue here that communicative practice constitutes the collaboration itself, at least insofar as collaborative practice implies a shared definition of the (patient's) situation and the collective determination of shared goals (Billett, 2014;Careau et al, 2012;Quinlan & Robertson, 2010) if not shared decision-making.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mapping Collective Sensemaking in Communication: The Interprofessional Patient Case Review in Acute Care Rounds

Fox¹,

Gilbert²

2015

Health &Amp; Interprofessional Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

INTRODUCTION Observational studies of the actual practices of interprofessional collaborative practice (ICP) are needed to complement research on the determinants and consequences of collaboration. This naturalistic study of team communication maps a key practice: the patient case review in daily rounds. Here, ICP is conceptualized as collective sensemaking, or the joint description of the patient's situation and associated action planning-a fundamentally communicative practice.

show abstract

Observation of interprofessional collaborative practice in primary care teams: An integrative literature review

Cited by 311 publications

References 47 publications

Teamwork in a coronary care unit: facilitating and hindering aspects

Teamwork in a coronary care unit: facilitating and hindering aspects

The Benefits and Challenges of Interprofessional Education Assessment for Health Care Professionals

Mapping Collective Sensemaking in Communication: The Interprofessional Patient Case Review in Acute Care Rounds

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About