2019
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.100.083523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Viable scalar spectral tilt and tensor-to-scalar ratio in near-matter bounces

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To induce the local effects of the singularity, we introduce a regulating Gaussian factor within the expression of a 2 (t) in Eq. (22). Such regulating factor actually controls when the singularity becomes effective.…”
Section: Realization Of a Bounce With A Type-iv Singularity That Loca...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To induce the local effects of the singularity, we introduce a regulating Gaussian factor within the expression of a 2 (t) in Eq. (22). Such regulating factor actually controls when the singularity becomes effective.…”
Section: Realization Of a Bounce With A Type-iv Singularity That Loca...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where ρ + n and ρ − m as positive real numbers. The negative energy density terms could either be arising from an exotic matter field (as, for instance, in [23][24][25]) or emerging from the corrections to the Einstein-Hilbert action introduced by a UV-complete quantum gravity theory (as, for instance, in [26]).…”
Section: Effective Matter Content Of Bouncing Models: General Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the above mentioned successes, the MBS is riddled with some problems, like -(1) the tensor to scalar ratio in the scalar-tensor MBS becomes too large to be consistent with the observational data [62], (2) during the contracting phase of the MBS, the anisotropic energy density grows faster compared to that of the bouncing agent and hence the model suffers from the BKL instability [58], (3) as the universe at late time is dominated by pressureless matter, the MBS does not predict the dark energy era of the universe -not consistent with the supernovae observations [59][60][61]. Successful attempts have been made to resolve these issues in modified theories of gravity [20,21,55,56,63,64]. For example, some of our authors proposed a smooth unification from a bounce to the dark energy era with an intermediate deceleration era in higher curvature theories of gravity both in the case of symmetric and asymmetric bounce scenarios [63,64], where the generation era of primordial perturbation modes become different depending on the symmetric / asymmetric character of the bounce.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%