2008
DOI: 10.1623/hysj.53.4.905
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vertical velocity distributions through and above submerged, flexible vegetation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
71
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
8
71
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…a large variation in the height and density of vegetation) affects the water velocity distributions in the cross section and hence also the roughness coefficient distributions. Tyminski (2012) and Kubrak et al (2008) have observed similar effects in laboratory conditions and Knight (2013) Strong correlation between the type of vegetation in the bypass channel and the flow speed was noticed. The revealed relationship was detected in a relatively narrow profile -20 metres upstream and 20 metres downstream of the hydrometric measurement profile.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…a large variation in the height and density of vegetation) affects the water velocity distributions in the cross section and hence also the roughness coefficient distributions. Tyminski (2012) and Kubrak et al (2008) have observed similar effects in laboratory conditions and Knight (2013) Strong correlation between the type of vegetation in the bypass channel and the flow speed was noticed. The revealed relationship was detected in a relatively narrow profile -20 metres upstream and 20 metres downstream of the hydrometric measurement profile.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…However, it must be pointed out that these results were achieved using a simulation under laboratory conditions. Natural conditions would be affected by the degree and direction of the slope of the land and by hydrological factors such as rainfall and surface soil moisture (Ishikawa et al 2000;Stone & Shen 2002;Nepf et al 2007;Kubrak et al 2008). The results obtained by the experiments, when applied to more complex natural conditions, may affect the applicability of the results under natural conditions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 8 shows the different possible configurations for each of the three length scales: s, k and D. To determine experimentally l 0 , the flow rate by integrating the calculated vertical velocity profile (steps 3c, 3d and 3e) is compared to the measured flow rate with an optimization method (simplex algorithm from Matlab). For all experiments from literature (Kouwen and Unny, 1969;Meijer and Velzen, 1999;Lopez and Garcia, 2001;Righetti and Armanini, 2002;Poggi et al, 2004;Jarvela, 2005;Ghisalberti and Nepf, 2006;Murphy and Nepf, 2007;Kubrak et al, 2008;Nezu and Sanjou, 2008;Huai et al, 2009;Yang and Choi, 2009;Florens et al, 2013) (2008) are reused, together with those obtained specifically for the present study. As indicated by Konings et al (2012), the experiments carried out with leafy vegetation behaved in a particular way because of viscosity terms.…”
Section: Submerged Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the experiments performed in this study, the averaged error is 15.8%. Poggi et al (2004), Meijer and Velzen (1999), Ghisalberti and Nepf (2006), Murphy and Nepf (2007), Nezu and Sanjou (2008), Yang and Choi (2009), Kubrak et al (2008), Jarvela (2005, Kouwen and Unny (1969), Florens et al (2013), Huai et al (2009), Righetti andArmanini (2002).…”
Section: Submerged Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%