2011
DOI: 10.1002/nag.1035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vertical response of pile raft foundations subjected to tunneling‐induced ground movements in layered soil

Abstract: SUMMARYA simplified analysis method has been developed to estimate the vertical movement and load distribution of pile raft foundations subjected to ground movements induced by tunneling based on a two-stage method. In this method, the Loganathan-Polous analytical solution is used to estimate the free soil movement induced by tunneling in the first stage. In the second stage, composing the soil movement to the pile, the governing equilibrium equations of piles are solved by the finite difference method. The in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(c) Korff (2012) applied the tanh function to model timber piles when subjected to tunnelling displacement profiles and produced a series of design charts for piles in soft clay. (d ) Huang & Mu (2012) noted that the internal interaction effects due to element-on-element loading resulted in greater pile axial loading and vertical displacements than for t-z models. Huang & Mu (2012) applied a method similar to BEM based on the Mindlin (1936) solutions for piles in layered soils; however, the method assumed linear elasticity and did not allow any pile-soil slip.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(c) Korff (2012) applied the tanh function to model timber piles when subjected to tunnelling displacement profiles and produced a series of design charts for piles in soft clay. (d ) Huang & Mu (2012) noted that the internal interaction effects due to element-on-element loading resulted in greater pile axial loading and vertical displacements than for t-z models. Huang & Mu (2012) applied a method similar to BEM based on the Mindlin (1936) solutions for piles in layered soils; however, the method assumed linear elasticity and did not allow any pile-soil slip.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…(d ) Huang & Mu (2012) noted that the internal interaction effects due to element-on-element loading resulted in greater pile axial loading and vertical displacements than for t-z models. Huang & Mu (2012) applied a method similar to BEM based on the Mindlin (1936) solutions for piles in layered soils; however, the method assumed linear elasticity and did not allow any pile-soil slip. (e) Basile (2014) presented a non-linear BEM solution for pile groups that took soil non-linearity at the soil-pile interface into account.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Employing the finite difference method, one can get vertical and horizontal equilibrium equations for a single pile in soils. Details of the finite difference method for the single pile can be found in reference , and . The equilibrium equations can be written as: boldI0n02Ep0d04L02boldIitalicpv0boldIitalicsv0boldq0=boldYv0 boldI0n04Ep0Ip0L04boldIitalicpL0boldIitalicsL0boldp0=boldYL0where I 0 is a unit matrix, E p 0 is the elastic modulus of the pile, d 0 is the diameter of the pile, L 0 is the length of the pile, n 0 is the total number of the elements along the pile, I p 0 is the moment of inertia of the pile, Ipv0 is the vertical pile flexibility matrix of the pile, IpL0 is the horizontal pile flexibility matrix of the pile, q 0 is the vertical nodal soil resistance force vector of the pile and p 0 is the horizontal nodal soil resistance force vector of the pile, boldYv0={}center2Q0πd0δ0000T, δ 0 = L 0 / n 0 , boldYL0={}center2δ03T0+2δ02M0δ04δ02M0…”
Section: Analysis Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analytical method proposed by [22] is widely recognized as one of the most important solutions for the problem [23,27,28]. And the empirical method proposed by [27] based on the analytical method [22] is proved to be the most useful method employed in practice [11,13,14,20]. Thus, the closed form of the empirical solution of free-field soil deformation induced by tunnelling is employed in this study for its easy application in layered soils:…”
Section: Free-field Soil Movement Induced By Tunnellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two-stage method was proved to be the procedure that is most likely to be used in practice to calculate pile responses induced by tunnelling [8,[10][11][12]. Based on analytical solutions for a multilayered soil system, some authors extended the two-stage method from a homogeneous soil system to a layered soil system [13,14]. Since then, most investigations concerned pile responses in the vertical or horizontal directions separately, while in practice vertical and horizontal responses occur simultaneously.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%