1999
DOI: 10.1029/98jb02842
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vertical movements and material transport during hotspot activity: Seismic reflection profiling offshore La Réunion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
75
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
5
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the vertical movement of La Réunion Island is not quantifiable at this timescale, a limited subsidence is consistent with the subsidence rate related to thermal subsidence rate for an oceanic hotspot island, as estimated in Mauritius at 0.03 mm.yr -1 (Montaggioni and Faure, 1997). On a longer time scale (a few million years), the lack of significant subsidence of La Réunion volcanics is also emphasised by the fact that the lithosphere beneath La Réunion is not significantly flexed, instead of most oceanic volcanic islands, suggesting that another process compensates for the load of the volcanic construction (De Voogd et al, 1999).…”
Section: Shelf Break and Other Slope Changessupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Although the vertical movement of La Réunion Island is not quantifiable at this timescale, a limited subsidence is consistent with the subsidence rate related to thermal subsidence rate for an oceanic hotspot island, as estimated in Mauritius at 0.03 mm.yr -1 (Montaggioni and Faure, 1997). On a longer time scale (a few million years), the lack of significant subsidence of La Réunion volcanics is also emphasised by the fact that the lithosphere beneath La Réunion is not significantly flexed, instead of most oceanic volcanic islands, suggesting that another process compensates for the load of the volcanic construction (De Voogd et al, 1999).…”
Section: Shelf Break and Other Slope Changessupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Large-scale flank collapse can transport 100-mto kilometer-scale megablocks into the moats (e.g., Moore et al, 1994). The moat has a maximum of 3 km thickness by up to 160 km width at Hawaii (e.g., ten Brink and Watts, 1985;Moore et al, 1994), a maximum of 455 m thickness by up to 250 km width at the Canary Islands (Collier and Watts, 2001;Gee et al, 2001), and a maximum of 520 m thickness by up to 130 km width at La Réunion island (southwestern Indian Ocean; de Voogd et al, 1999;Oehler et al, 2008) (widths as measured from Figure 1 and from Oehler et al [2008]). Relatively little sediment is deposited on the flanks of the actual seamounts; these are dominated by sediment erosion and bypass into the moat (Leslie et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussion Of Formation Models and Comparison To Volcaniclasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moat basins can accommodate the deposition of a thickness of up to 3 km of sediment from the adjacent seamounts through mass wasting of the igneous rocks and sedimentary cover (ten Brink and Watts, 1985). Even when a flexural moat is not obvious, major islands are typically surrounded by sedimentary debris aprons with up to 520-m-thick deposits extending >100 km away from the island (e.g., de Voogd et al, 1999). The subduction of a seamount chain's debris apron and/or moat sediments (hereafter referred to as "moat") offers a hitherto unconsidered opportunity for accretion of oceanic sediments at an otherwise "erosive" subduction margin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, recent geophysical studies have provided valuable data on the interior of the island through seismic de Voogd et al 1999;Gallart et al 1999), gravity (Malengreau et al 1999), and magnetic investigations (LØnat et al 2001). However, the geological structure and the evolution of this volcanic system remain insufficiently understood, partly due to a lack of studies on its submarine part.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%