[1] The 11-13 January 2011 eruptive episode at Etna volcano occurred after several months of increasing ash emissions from the summit craters, and was heralded by increasing SO 2 output, which peaked at ∼5000 megagrams/day several hours before the start of the eruptive activity. The eruptive episode began with a phase of Strombolian activity from a pit crater on the eastern flank of the SE-Crater. Explosions became more intense with time and eventually became transitional between Strombolian and fountaining, before moving into a lava fountaining phase. Fountaining was accompanied by lava output from the lower rim of the pit crater. Emplacement of the resulting lava flow field, as well as associated lava fountain-and Strombolian-phases, was tracked using a remote sensing network comprising both thermal and visible cameras. Thermal surveys completed once the eruptive episode had ended also allowed us to reconstruct the emplacement of the lava flow field. Using a high temporal resolution geostationary satellite data we were also able to construct a detailed record of the heat flux during the fountain-fed flow phase and its subsequent cooling. The dense rock volume of erupted lava obtained from the satellite data was 1.2 × 10 6 m 3 ; this was emplaced over a period of about 6 h to give a mean output rate of ∼55 m 3 s −1 . By comparison, geologic data allowed us to estimate dense rock volumes of ∼0.85 × 10 6 m 3 for the pyroclastics erupted during the lava fountain phase, and 0.84-1.7 × 10 6 m 3 for lavas erupted during the effusive phase, resulting in a total erupted dense rock volume of 1.7-2.5 × 10 6 m 3 and a mean output rate of 78-117 m 3 s −1 . The sequence of events and quantitative results presented here shed light on the shallow feeding system of the volcano.
International audienceThis work presents the first exhaustive study of the entire surface of the Reunion Island volcanic system. The focus is on the submarine part, for which a compilation of all multibeam data collected during the last 20 years has been made. Different types of submarine features have been identified: a coastal shelf, debris avalanches and sedimentary deposits, erosion canyons, volcanic constructions near the coast, and seamounts offshore. Criteria have been defined to differentiate the types of surfaces and to establish their relative chronology where possible. Debris avalanche deposits are by far the most extensive and voluminous formations in the submarine domain. They have built four huge Submarine Bulges to the east, north, west, and south of the island. They form fans 20–30 km wide at the coastline and 100–150 km wide at their ends, 70–80 km offshore. They were built gradually by the superimposition and/or juxtaposition of products moved during landslide episodes, involving up to several hundred cubic kilometers of material. About 50 individual events deposits can be recognized at the surface. The landslides have recurrently dismantled Piton des Neiges, Les Alizés, and Piton de La Fournaise volcanoes since 2 Ma. About one third are interpreted as secondary landslides, affecting previously emplaced debris avalanche deposits. On land, landslide deposits are observed in the extensively eroded central area of Piton des Neiges and in its coastal areas. Analysis of the present-day topography and of geology allows us to identify presumed faults and scars of previous large landslides. The Submarine Bulges are dissected and bound by canyons up to 200 m deep and 40 km long, filled with coarse-grained sediments, and generally connected to streams onshore. A large zone of sedimentary accumulation exists to the north–east of the island. It covers a zone 20 km in width, extending up to 15 km offshore. Volcanic constructions are observed near the coast on both Piton des Neiges and Piton de la Fournaise volcanoes and are continuations of subaerial structures. Individual seamounts are present on the submarine flanks and the surrounding ocean floor. A few seem to be young volcanoes, but the majority are probably old, eroded seamounts. This study suggests a larger scale and frequency of mass-wasting events on Reunion Island compared to similar islands. The virtual absence of downward flexure of the lithosphere beneath the island probably contributes to this feature. The increased number of known flank–failure events has to be taken into consideration when assessing hazards from future landslides, in particular, the probability of landslide-generated tsunamis
New studies confirm the existence of large landslide events related to both the Piton des Neiges and the Piton de la Fournaise volcanic systems. Like many other island basaltic shield volcanoes, R6union Island has had a complex evolution combining construction processes and recurrent destructive events. Landslide deposits probably form an important part of its internal structure. Sliding events and related tsunamis are one of the major hazards of this kind of volcanic activity, in an intraplate oceanic context.The submarine flank of Piton de la Fournaise has been extensively studied using Seabeam bathymetry and high resolution side-scan sonar images. The eastern submarine flank is entirely covered by 550 km 3 of landslide deposits, which are mainly subaerially erupted basaltic lavas, transported and fractured in large-scale mass wasting. Volumetric considerations imply recurrent partial destruction of the edifice, by landsliding, during its construction. For each sector collapse the fundamental process is the sliding of large blocks, up to several kilometres in length. Fractions of the slide blocks break up and evolve into debris avalanches.Analogue experiments have been carried out to tentatively explain the geometry of these periodic large landslides of the unbuttressed flank. The morphology and the deformation in the landslides of the model are compared to the natural system of Piton de la Fournaise.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.