Vertical Integration of Enterprise Industrial Systems Utilizing Web Services

Καλογεράς, Αθανάσιος; Gialelis, John; Alexakos, Christos; Georgoudakis, M.; Koubias, Stavros

doi:10.1109/tii.2006.875507

Cited by 95 publications

(28 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…7 RosettaNet provides complete specifications for the PIPs defined, which are similar to the CBAs presented in this section. However, RosettaNet's specifications are tailored to the specificities of the electronics and high-tech industry.…”

Section: Inter-organizational Collaborative Business Activitiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A framework proposal for seamless interoperability in a collaborative networked environment

Chituc

Azevedo

Toscano

2009

Computers in Industry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Inter-organizational Collaborative Business Activitiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Nevertheless, this objective has not been totally achieved (e.g., [2,[5][6][7]). Causes are diverse, and include: heterogeneity and lack of resources (e.g., [8]); lack of a generally accepted definition of interoperability (e.g., [9]); inadequate implementation, poorly managed risks and requirements.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A framework proposal for seamless interoperability in a collaborative networked environment

Chituc

Azevedo

Toscano

2009

Computers in Industry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Ontologies have already been proposed as the tool for providing the necessary level of system's interoperability during manufacturing process design and execution [2]. The P2 Ontology will provide formal and unambiguous definition of all the components and of their interactions in an enterprise/manufacturing industrial environment in order to establish a common "language" for exchanging and describing all complex information related to the lower levels of an industry.…”

Section: Manufacturing Environment Ontologymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…DFP DFP RF RF P2AbilityApplication, P2 Control Buildi ngBlocks (2) P2Resource, P2Abil ity, P2Devices, P2ControlBuildingBlocks, (P2AbilityApplication (1) ) (1) Refers to modification of an existing P2AbilityApplication (2) New P2ControlBuildingBlocks must be stored in the P2 system model The entity responsible for the execution of a P2Activity, and then of a P2AbilityApplication is the Resource Agent, that provides software tenets (P2CD Proxies) that allows to map a DFP into its DF on the P2CD (whose behavior is controlled by the Device Manager). The P2Activity execution process is shown in Figure 4, where the Execution Manager block is a P2-defined standard block responsible for the start/stop of the P2AbilityApplication as well as for the collection of execution progress information.…”

Section: Dfpmentioning

confidence: 99%

Ontology-driven control application design methodology

Καλογεράς

Ferrarini

Lüeder

et al. 2007

2007 IEEE Conference on Emerging Technologies &Amp; Factory Automation (EFTA 2007)

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The paper deals with the problem of modeling and implementation of distributed automation systems for manufacturing applications. In particular, a novel approach has been conceived. A suitable meta-model of the production system has been derived, compliant with the state-of-the-art industrial standards. After the compilation and validation stages, an ontology is derived containing all the necessary definitions of modeling entities and constraints, to be used directly and explicitly in the execution of the control code. This entitles the control application to be defined as "model-driven" or better "ontology-driven". The results are obtained within the running EU project PABADIS'PROMISE (P2).

show abstract

“…During the past years, XML and Web Services have been increasingly seen as a solution for a larger distributed system [12]. These criteria fit the intelligent building due to its diversification subsystems with various applications.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Middleware for heterogeneous subsystems interoperability in intelligent buildings

Perumal

Ramli

Leong

et al. 2010

Automation in Construction

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

a b s t r a c t a r t i c l e i n f o Managing heterogeneous subsystems in an intelligent building has always been elusive due to lack of interoperability factor. This is due to the nature of heterogeneous systems in an intelligent building as a distributed entity that needs a certain degree of interoperability and joint execution of tasks for managing heterogeneous systems that consist of different platforms and protocols. There is a need for interoperability in an intelligent building with a bespoke solution that could make the heterogeneous subsystems 'talk' with each other and interoperate regardless of the operating platform. To solve the interoperability problem, Web Services technology is seen as a potential solution that could deal with the dynamic environment of an intelligent building. In this paper, we describe a SOAP-based middleware implementation for managing heterogeneous subsystems in an intelligent building. The proposed middleware solution utilizes the SOAP technology together with ECA rule mechanism in managing subsystems interoperation in a federated manner. Experiments and performance evaluation of the middleware had been carried out to justify the performance requirement of heterogeneous systems in an intelligent building.

show abstract

Vertical Integration of Enterprise Industrial Systems Utilizing Web Services

Cited by 95 publications

References 9 publications

A framework proposal for seamless interoperability in a collaborative networked environment

A framework proposal for seamless interoperability in a collaborative networked environment

Ontology-driven control application design methodology

Middleware for heterogeneous subsystems interoperability in intelligent buildings

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About