2010
DOI: 10.3354/meps08787
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vertical cell movement is a primary response of intertidal benthic biofilms to increasing light dose

Abstract: Intertidal soft sediment microphytobenthic biofilms are often dominated by diatoms, which are able to regulate their photosynthesis by physiological processes (e.g. down-regulation through the xanthophyll cycle, referred to as non-photochemical quenching, NPQ) and behavioural processes (e.g. vertical cell movement in the sediment -biofilm matrix). This study investigated these 2 processes over a 6 h emersion period using chemical inhibitors under 2 light treatments (ambient and constant light at 300 µmol m -2 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
82
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
7
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…EPL is not only more abundant in muddy cohesive sediments where light penetration is more restricted than in sandy sediments (Paterson and Hagerthey 2001;Cartaxana et al, 2011), but, more importantly, their (micro-) migratory behaviour allows positioning at the optimal irradiance in the vertical light gradient and rapid escape from periodic excess light (Kromkamp et al, 1998;Conn et al, 2004;Consalvey et al, 2004;Serô dio et al, 2006). This alleviates the need to invest in a strong physiological capacity to respond to light stress as previously proposed Cartaxana et al, 2011), although the right balance between motility and physiology still remains essential (van Leeuwe et al, 2009;Perkins et al, 2010b;Cartaxana et al, 2011;Serô dio et al, 2012). Such balance is more crucial in the EPM-M species, which can move but have only limited control over their immediate light environment as movement is restricted, usually within the sphere of individual sand grains.…”
Section: Photoprotection In Intertidal Benthic Diatomsmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…EPL is not only more abundant in muddy cohesive sediments where light penetration is more restricted than in sandy sediments (Paterson and Hagerthey 2001;Cartaxana et al, 2011), but, more importantly, their (micro-) migratory behaviour allows positioning at the optimal irradiance in the vertical light gradient and rapid escape from periodic excess light (Kromkamp et al, 1998;Conn et al, 2004;Consalvey et al, 2004;Serô dio et al, 2006). This alleviates the need to invest in a strong physiological capacity to respond to light stress as previously proposed Cartaxana et al, 2011), although the right balance between motility and physiology still remains essential (van Leeuwe et al, 2009;Perkins et al, 2010b;Cartaxana et al, 2011;Serô dio et al, 2012). Such balance is more crucial in the EPM-M species, which can move but have only limited control over their immediate light environment as movement is restricted, usually within the sphere of individual sand grains.…”
Section: Photoprotection In Intertidal Benthic Diatomsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…To prevent photoinhibition (Serô dio et al, 2008), benthic diatoms utilize behavioural and physiological responses (Mouget et al, 2008;van Leeuwe et al, 2009;Perkins et al, 2010b;Cartaxana et al, 2011;Serôdio et al, 2012). Behavioural photoprotection involves motility, allowing cells to position themselves in light gradients and escape from prolonged exposure to excess light (Admiraal, 1984;Kromkamp et al, 1998;Consalvey et al, 2004;Serô dio et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In intertidal soft sediments, microphytobenthos (generally diatom dominated) exhibit rhythmic vertical migrations across the photic zone of the sediment, related to tidal and day−night cycles, usually moving downwards at high tide to intercept light and/or escape grazers and predators (Consalvey et al 2004). In addition, at low tide under supersaturating light intensities, diatoms exhibit a negative phototaxis resulting in downward micro-migration (Perkins et al 2010). From a physiological perspective, both diatoms and cyanobacteria can dissipate excess energy through non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) of chl a fluorescence (Bailey & Grossman 2008, Perkins et al 2010, as well as synthesize EPS substances, which are typically produced during emersion periods to protect them against desiccation and facilitate movement (Decho 1990, Potts 1999, Underwood & Paterson 2003.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, at low tide under supersaturating light intensities, diatoms exhibit a negative phototaxis resulting in downward micro-migration (Perkins et al 2010). From a physiological perspective, both diatoms and cyanobacteria can dissipate excess energy through non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) of chl a fluorescence (Bailey & Grossman 2008, Perkins et al 2010, as well as synthesize EPS substances, which are typically produced during emersion periods to protect them against desiccation and facilitate movement (Decho 1990, Potts 1999, Underwood & Paterson 2003. What can observed changes in RVI on a daily scale tell us about physiological and behavioral responses of rocky shore EMPB to increasing irradiance or desiccation conditions?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, vertical migration has been investigated and recognized as a photoprotective mechanism, operating complementarily to the main physiological photoprotection processes (e.g. the xanthophyll cycle; Mouget et al, 2008;Serôdio et al, 2008Serôdio et al, , 2012Perkins et al, 2010;Cartaxana et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%