2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.04.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vertebral Compression Fracture (VCF) After Spine Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT): Analysis of Predictive Factors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

9
167
4
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 218 publications
(189 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
9
167
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…4,5,19,20 Although radiation treatment provides pain relief in general, it is not effective in palliating mechanical pain related to spinal instability or fracture. Rather than subjecting patients with advanced cancer to a major open surgery, procedures like BKP have evolved as an attractive minimally invasive solution to provide both spinal stability and mechanical pain palliation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4,5,19,20 Although radiation treatment provides pain relief in general, it is not effective in palliating mechanical pain related to spinal instability or fracture. Rather than subjecting patients with advanced cancer to a major open surgery, procedures like BKP have evolved as an attractive minimally invasive solution to provide both spinal stability and mechanical pain palliation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,5,[19][20][21] In the treatment of VCFs, surgical management has shifted from open invasive surgery that can put the patient at moderately high risk of developing complications 2 to minimally invasive percutaneous procedures. 3,9,10,15 This change in practice has been driven largely by the intent of providing pain relief and vertebral stability while minimizing the interruption in patients' overall oncological care.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This complication is emerging with high crude risks ranging from 11% to 39%. 1,2,4 The dilemma lies in the SRS-induced VCF as to whether the cause is disease progression or simply loss of the mechanical integrity of the vertebral segment with the tumor still locally controlled. Our report describes for the first time the potential for osteoradionecrosis in the differential diagnosis of SRS-induced VCF.…”
Section: Department Of Radiation Oncology Sunnybrook Health Sciencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,5,7,8 In addition to the potential for bone and spinal cord damage from SRS, there is also the risk of vertebral compression fracture (VCF), estimated to be 11%-39%. [1][2][3]6 Patients who received the highest biologically effective dose (20-24 Gy in one setting) were at greatest risk for developing VCF, 3 and the etiology was hypothesized to be due to radiation-induced effects within the tumor and bone that caused structural weakening of the vertebral body. Open surgery, further radiation therapy, or chemotherapy would then be options for the treatment of this clinical problem.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior spine radiation results in increased risk of vertebral compression fractures. [1][2][3] Failure of fixation may require interruption or delay of systemic or radiation therapy, increasing the risk of local or systemic tumor progression. Vertebral compression fractures either within or adjacent to the surgical construct often result in either recurrent or progressive back pain.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%