2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.05.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Verification of model wave heights with long-term moored buoy data: Application to wave field over the Indian Ocean

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here the main interest is to clarify the issue of unity for a set of distinguished discrete harmonics, valid in the whole IO as a single system. In this paper, all these points were considered and solved based on the wind field from the ERA‐Interim reanalysis for 1979–2015 years and the wavefield calculated earlier with the modified wind‐wave model WAM [ Samiksha et al ., ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here the main interest is to clarify the issue of unity for a set of distinguished discrete harmonics, valid in the whole IO as a single system. In this paper, all these points were considered and solved based on the wind field from the ERA‐Interim reanalysis for 1979–2015 years and the wavefield calculated earlier with the modified wind‐wave model WAM [ Samiksha et al ., ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the issue of data preparation and quality verification has been discussed in the literature [see Pogarskii et al ., , and references therein], we do not dwell on this point. Note only that the both types of data correlate well with the buoy observations, and RMS errors are 10% and 15% for wind speed and wave height, respectively [ Polnikov , ; Samiksha et al ., ]. As shown in Polnikov and Pogarskii [], this provides a good correspondence between spectral shapes for S U ( ω ) and SHS()ω, obtained from both the field and model data.…”
Section: Input Data Methods Of Processing and Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quality of wave prediction and analysis is also being continuously improved mainly due to the availability of high quality input wind fields for sea-state prediction with the advancement of satellite measurements/oceanography. In the Indian context, there are many reported important research contributions on wave prediction/ hindcasting using third generation wave models [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The numerical models have become a tool to get long-term wave information in high-resolution (spatial and temporal) in areas devoid of measurements (Appendini et al, 2014). The numerical models such as Wave Action Model (WAM) (WAMDI Group, 1988), WAVEWATCH III (WW3) (Tolman, 1991;, Simulating WAves Nearshore (SWAN) (Booij et al, 1999), MIKE21 Spectral Waves (DHI, 2011) are 20 commonly used (Chawla et al, 2007) and several wave hindcast studies were carried out in the Arabian Sea in the past (Remya et al, 2012;Sandhya et al, 2014;Samiksha et al, 2015;Amrutha et al, 2016). Recently, ocean state forecast has gained significance and has become a challenging task, considering the range of wide user community and varied demands (Amrutha et al, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, ocean state forecast has gained significance and has become a challenging task, considering the range of wide user community and varied demands (Amrutha et al, 2016). The numerical modelling studies in the Arabian Sea indicates that during the high sea states (H s > 4 m), WAM underestimates the H s by 0.5 to 1 m (12 to 25%) (Samiksha et al, 2015). After the JONSWAP field experiment 25 (Hasselmann et al, 1973) in the North Sea, many studies are conducted on the wave growth and decay in varying wind fields (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%