2018
DOI: 10.5604/01.3001.0012.8365
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Verification of boundary conditions of numerical modeling of the track substructure thermal regime – influence of the snow cover

Abstract: The initial part of the paper briefly characterizes a long-term experimental activity at the Department of Railway Engineering and Track Management (DRETM). The research of the DRETM focuses, besides other research activities and specific problems in the field of railway engineering (application of new structures and construction materials in conventional and modernized railway tracks, modernisation and rehabilitation of existing railway tracks for higher speeds, track diagnostics, influence of track operation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference between the values determined by the experimental and numerical methods is 0.002 m, which is a negligible difference with respect to the methodology of design of the structural sub-ballast layers of the railway line [ 100 ]. Moreover, the obtained accuracy of recreating the measurement results in the numerical model is the same as for other railway track substructure–subsoil systems [ 7 ] and consistent with previous observations [ 109 ]. Therefore, the model can be considered validated.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The difference between the values determined by the experimental and numerical methods is 0.002 m, which is a negligible difference with respect to the methodology of design of the structural sub-ballast layers of the railway line [ 100 ]. Moreover, the obtained accuracy of recreating the measurement results in the numerical model is the same as for other railway track substructure–subsoil systems [ 7 ] and consistent with previous observations [ 109 ]. Therefore, the model can be considered validated.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The SV-HEAT allows for these experiments and calculations, which are based on finite element calculations (formulas and calculations are part of company materials under copyright). The SV-HEAT was verified by previous research tasks and was mainly compared with the built in situ models of the heavy laboratory of the Department of Railway Engineering (DRE) by Hodas et al [9]; Izvolt, Dobes and Hodas [10]; Izvolt, Dobes and Pies [11]; and by Sestakova and Dobes [12].…”
Section: Numerical Modeling Of Transition Zonessupporting
confidence: 54%
“…In the numerical models, a value of nf = 0.6 (the value attributable to the thickness of the snow cover aligned to the top surface of the ballast bed) was used during the winter period. The influence of snow cover thickness on the nf factor values was presented in Ižvolt et al (2018). -10 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 The calculation of the freezing of the structural layers of the railway track in numerical models was performed using the FlexPDE programme and the ACU-MESH programme was used to visualize the solution results (Fredlund & Haihua, 2011).…”
Section: Methodology For Determining the Freezing Of Sub-ballast Laye...mentioning
confidence: 99%